IBM Operational Decision Manager vs. SAP NetWeaver BPM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Operational Decision Manager
ScoreĀ 6.7Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
IBM Operational Decision Manager is presented as a comprehensive decision automation solution that helps users discover, capture, analyze, automate and govern rules-based business decisions, on premises or on cloud. It is formerly known as the IBM Websphere Operational Decision Management, and before that as the ILOG JRules Business Rules Management System (BRMS).N/A
SAP BPM
ScoreĀ 9.5Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
SAP NetWeaver Business Process Management is a business process management offering and application infrastructure. It supports joint modeling of processes, central process execution via a Java-based engine, provision of interfaces for users, and integration of business rules into processes.N/A
Pricing
IBM Operational Decision ManagerSAP NetWeaver BPM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Operational Decision ManagerSAP BPM
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Detailsā€”ā€”
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Operational Decision ManagerSAP NetWeaver BPM
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
IBM Operational Decision ManagerSAP NetWeaver BPM
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IBM Operational Decision Manager
-
Ratings
SAP NetWeaver BPM
10.0
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
IBM Operational Decision Manager
-
Ratings
SAP NetWeaver BPM
10.0
2 Ratings
18% above category average
Process designer00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Support for modeling languages00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Operational Decision Manager
-
Ratings
SAP NetWeaver BPM
10.0
2 Ratings
19% above category average
Social collaboration tools00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
IBM Operational Decision Manager
-
Ratings
SAP NetWeaver BPM
10.0
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Content management00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Operational Decision ManagerSAP NetWeaver BPM
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
ScoreĀ 9.9Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
ScoreĀ 9.1Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
ScoreĀ 9.9Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
ScoreĀ 9.1Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
ScoreĀ 9.1Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Operational Decision ManagerSAP NetWeaver BPM
Likelihood to Recommend
5.9
(6 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Operational Decision ManagerSAP NetWeaver BPM
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM Operational Decision Manager can be used to manage complex business processes with less use of IT infrastructure and more use of centralized decision making. Decision-making depends on a logical framework and the creation of commands for better futuristic decisions with less time consumption and more precision and accuracy. IBM's Operational decision manager application is well suited for such scenarios where complex processes have to be streamlined.
Read full review
SAP
It is well suited when we need to integrate business processes with SAP ERP and SAP CRM - the solution can be integrated with business rules/procedures defined in SAP ERP/CRM and NetWeaver can be used to monitor the rules and flag off exceptions. When there are multiple workflows running, it tends to slow down running of these processes. Also, it entirely depends on SAP portal for it to run efficiently.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Excellent stability and performance, as well as the possibility to deploy more quickly.
  • Simple but effective web-based user interface that enables us to make direct updates to our policies or rules.
  • Effective rule Execution Server, which allows us to assess the rules and their performance
  • After the rules are delivered, business users can make changes and keep them up to date without having to know a lot about technology.
Read full review
SAP
  • Virtual paper trail. Iterations of process and current documentation are all stored as "artifacts", leaving a great trail.
  • Configuration of users. BPM somewhat magically determines which users will be impacted and automates rules.
  • A pro (that is also a con) is the design interface. If you know what you are doing, it is incredibly powerful and malleable.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Business rule application development available only in Java, .net, and Cobol.
  • Integration supports with legacy system need to be improved (Mainframe).
  • Migration to latest -version (iLog JRules to ODM).
Read full review
SAP
  • Live readings would be nice.
  • Easier to maneuver
  • Work with all systems with the press of one keystroke
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
No answers on this topic
SAP
As a big fan of SAP in general, the BPM solution fits right in with all the other things SAP does well, and does it with incredible efficiency
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
SAP
We have our own tech support for systems, I would say they probably could use more training on it, I don't really think it's anything regarding the SAP system, but more the knowledge they have on the system itself. It seems to take longer for them to fix any issues we may come across.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
When compared to other vendors in the business rule management system, IBM Operational Decision Manager stands out in dimensions of rule engine capabilities, deployment flexibility, and ease of maintenance. It offers a wide spectrum of configuration options to build applications that can be used by developed by technical and non-technical/business users.
Read full review
SAP
I found the initial setup of NetWeaver is much simpler than other products especially in an SAP environment where we have SAP ERP/HRM/CRM as it can be well integrated with other SAP products. The only drawback is the need/dependency on SAP Portal. It is better suited in an environment where SAP ERP is running.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • It has a positive impact as it provides a great way to define business rules, execute them, update them, manage different versions of rules.
  • Depending on the complexity of the applications, you can have thousands of rules.
  • It provides a nice way to test the rules, run simulations with different scenarios, different scales of requests and verify the decisions, performance, etc., and that helps a lot.
  • Since the decisions can be exposed through REST interface, it makes it very convenient to integrate with different applications, applications using different technologies.
  • The Business console makes it easy for business users to be able to define, modify rules and not have to depend on IT to do a lot of that work. This helps in bringing the time to change and use the rules to be very short as well as lets IT do more IT related tasks and provide better value to the organization.
Read full review
SAP
  • Helped us harness integrated benefit from having SAP ERP/CRM by leveraging NetWeaver to define business processes/rules and monitor exceptions
  • Did not have any negative experience except for the fact that at times when multiple rules run, it can be somewhat slow
Read full review
ScreenShots