TrustRadius

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. mabl

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM DevOps Test UI
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI and data-driven testing. IBM DevOps Test UI is an automated functional and regression testing tool for GUI and data-driven testing. It supports a range of applications, including web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, and PowerBuilder.N/A
mabl
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
mabl is a regression test automation tool with test output visualization and performance regression for tracking the perceived speed of web apps and sites, from the company of the same name in Boston.N/A
Pricing
IBM DevOps Test UImabl
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM DevOps Test UImabl
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM DevOps Test UImabl
Features
IBM DevOps Test UImabl
Automation Testing
Comparison of Automation Testing features of Product A and Product B
IBM DevOps Test UI
-
Ratings
mabl
10.0
1 Ratings
18% above category average
Record and Automate00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Multi-Browser Testing00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Test Scheduling00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Test Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
CI/CD Tool Integration00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Object Recognition00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM DevOps Test UImabl
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM DevOps Test UImabl
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM DevOps Test UImabl
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM Rational Functional Tester is good for automating thick applications.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
mabl
We haven't found a scenario yet where it hasn't been appropriate. We did have one function on our application that mabl couldn't do, but they solved it and got back to us very quickly. Our application is web-based and mabl is able to handle this very easily. We use the command line runner a lot. Being able to easily and quickly change from a cloud based run to a local run has been fantastic. Setting up flows and environments is a wonderful feature
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • An execution log in html format provides detailed information of the actions, verifications, and screenshots with timestamps.
  • Quick response and good support. IBM releases frequent updates to handle customer needs and fix issues.
  • A solid object inspector, extensive functional library and playback monitor.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
mabl
  • mabl trainer - record and play back test cases
  • Organization - labels and flows make this easy
  • Customer support!
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Installation or updates were not always perfect. Would have to clean previous installations or reinstall Java if there were errors.
  • No or very limited support of browsers outside of Internet Explorer.
  • Uses a lot of memory, can have memory issues on large tests.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
mabl
  • Asserts could be easier to add, but they aren't terribly hard
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Selenium is similar to IBM Rational Functional Tester but is not as user friendly and does not support thick applications. Visual Studio Coded UI is newer so not as refined; the object inspector/management and execution log results is poor compared to IBM Rational Functional Tester.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
mabl
We ultimately selected mabl cause it most met our needs and our budget. We needed a low code UI automation test tool. We also have a suite of existing testing tools and other tools that it needed to be able to integrate with. Price was the only thing that ruled out some of the above tools, we are a small start up, and don't have a huge budget. Some tools listed didn't have the same functionality or ease of use with the record and playback. mabl works on our machines and integrates with our existing tools
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Speeds up and broadens the testing cycle by using machine time for regression testing.
  • Frees up time for testers to focus on critical items outside the automated suite.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
mabl
  • We are able to more quickly automate UI tests
LK
Lisa Krol
Quality Assurance Engineer
Read full review
ScreenShots

mabl Screenshots

Screenshot of Testing the login flow of the Freshbooks web application. Each test step is created by interacting with your application and is recorded in the mabl Trainer.Screenshot of Parameterized JavaScript enables everyone to contribute to building automated tests.Screenshot of View of mabl's insights and reporting. In this view, we're looking at mabl's release coverage dashboard, which includes passing rate, quality metrics, and more.Screenshot of Quickly create Jira tickets directly from test failures. All of the test execution data will be automatically pulled into the issue in Jira.Screenshot of Setting up a test as a part of your workflow in GitHub Actions.