IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Protractor

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM DevOps Test UI
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI and data-driven testing. IBM DevOps Test UI is an automated functional and regression testing tool for GUI and data-driven testing. It supports a range of applications, including web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, and PowerBuilder.N/A
Protractor
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Protractor is an end to end test framework for Angular apps.N/A
Pricing
IBM DevOps Test UIProtractor
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM DevOps Test UIProtractor
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM DevOps Test UIProtractor
Best Alternatives
IBM DevOps Test UIProtractor
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.5 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.5 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.5 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM DevOps Test UIProtractor
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM DevOps Test UIProtractor
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM Rational Functional Tester is good for automating thick applications.
Read full review
Open Source
It is a strong fit for end-to-end acceptance and regression testing inside the browser.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • An execution log in html format provides detailed information of the actions, verifications, and screenshots with timestamps.
  • Quick response and good support. IBM releases frequent updates to handle customer needs and fix issues.
  • A solid object inspector, extensive functional library and playback monitor.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Async operations for browser-based validation tests. This kind of feature is a must-have for building tests to scale.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Installation or updates were not always perfect. Would have to clean previous installations or reinstall Java if there were errors.
  • No or very limited support of browsers outside of Internet Explorer.
  • Uses a lot of memory, can have memory issues on large tests.
Read full review
Open Source
  • It would be great to see the Protractor API implemented successfully inside a non-Angular web application.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Selenium is similar to IBM Rational Functional Tester but is not as user friendly and does not support thick applications. Visual Studio Coded UI is newer so not as refined; the object inspector/management and execution log results is poor compared to IBM Rational Functional Tester.
Read full review
Open Source
Cypress.io is an alternative end-to-end test framework that does NOT use Selenium. Since I've only evaluated this tool as a possible solution, my estimation of its performance against Protractor is incomplete. However, if you and your team are looking for automation solutions outside of the Selenium scope, then Cypress.io may be a good fit given the problems you're trying to solve.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Speeds up and broadens the testing cycle by using machine time for regression testing.
  • Frees up time for testers to focus on critical items outside the automated suite.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Increased the number of reliable end to end tests inside my test suites.
  • Decreased the number and frequency of false-positive test runs/results.
Read full review
ScreenShots