TrustRadius

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. pytest

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM DevOps Test UI
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI and data-driven testing. IBM DevOps Test UI is an automated functional and regression testing tool for GUI and data-driven testing. It supports a range of applications, including web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, and PowerBuilder.N/A
pytest
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The pytest framework enables users to write small, readable tests, and can scale to support complex functional testing for applications and libraries.N/A
Pricing
IBM DevOps Test UIpytest
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM DevOps Test UIpytest
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM DevOps Test UIpytest
Considered Both Products
IBM DevOps Test UI
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose IBM DevOps Test UI
Selenium is similar to IBM Rational Functional Tester but is not as user friendly and does not support thick applications. Visual Studio Coded UI is newer so not as refined; the object inspector/management and execution log results is poor compared to IBM Rational Functional …
pytest

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
IBM DevOps Test UIpytest
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM DevOps Test UIpytest
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM DevOps Test UIpytest
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM Rational Functional Tester is good for automating thick applications.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • An execution log in html format provides detailed information of the actions, verifications, and screenshots with timestamps.
  • Quick response and good support. IBM releases frequent updates to handle customer needs and fix issues.
  • A solid object inspector, extensive functional library and playback monitor.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Installation or updates were not always perfect. Would have to clean previous installations or reinstall Java if there were errors.
  • No or very limited support of browsers outside of Internet Explorer.
  • Uses a lot of memory, can have memory issues on large tests.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Selenium is similar to IBM Rational Functional Tester but is not as user friendly and does not support thick applications. Visual Studio Coded UI is newer so not as refined; the object inspector/management and execution log results is poor compared to IBM Rational Functional Tester.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Speeds up and broadens the testing cycle by using machine time for regression testing.
  • Frees up time for testers to focus on critical items outside the automated suite.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots