IBM Security QRadar EDR vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Security QRadar EDR
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users…N/A
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management.
$2.50
per user/per month
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar EDRMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Academic
$2.50
per user/per month
Standalone
$5.20
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Security QRadar EDRMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Security QRadar EDRMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Considered Both Products
IBM Security QRadar EDR
Chose IBM Security QRadar EDR
We had a lot of experience with IBM security products and services, and IBM Security QRadar EDR offered a low risk approach to endhance endpoint secuirty protection.
Chose IBM Security QRadar EDR
Ease of deployment, gartner leader solution and with help of IBM Security QRadar EDR as SIEM to integrate with the EDR solution of IBM. Visualization is beautiful which provides the right source of information also by keeping the visibility of the actual threats and keep away …
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Chose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Microsoft comes as a bundle suite and for other solutions the purchasing needs to be done separately.
Chose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is one of the best solutions when the goal is to protect the endpoints of a windows oriented infrastructure. The integrations with the Microsoft services and the unified platform that the analyst can use play a decisive role in the choice and …
Features
IBM Security QRadar EDRMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Security QRadar EDR
7.7
10 Ratings
10% below category average
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
8.7
78 Ratings
3% above category average
Anti-Exploit Technology7.79 Ratings8.975 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)7.910 Ratings9.277 Ratings
Centralized Management7.710 Ratings8.777 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support7.39 Ratings7.210 Ratings
Infection Remediation7.610 Ratings9.075 Ratings
Malware Detection8.010 Ratings9.276 Ratings
Vulnerability Management00 Ratings8.772 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Security QRadar EDRMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.4 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Security QRadar EDRMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Likelihood to Recommend
7.2
(11 ratings)
8.9
(136 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(10 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(11 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Security QRadar EDRMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM Security QRadaar EDR provides all the security features at one place with a reasonable price. Though for smaller organizations, the price may be quite high. Plus since it can detect threats and malwares in real time, every business should try them out.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is easy to deployed across the entire organization. Having a cloud based solution with a single pane of glass to manage all assets is a real no-brainer. Being able to receive immediate alerts when suspicious activity occurs is extremely helpful in keeping risks at a minimum. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint management is also smart enough to not send several alerts when an attack could be hitting multiple targets within a certain time frame or when it's the same attack multiple times. However, be prepared to click through multiple pages all over the site to figure out what happened when an attack occurs.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Detect known and unknown endpoint security threats
  • Remediate these threats near real time
  • Automation in threat detection
  • Threat attack attack visualization storyboards
  • Alert management authomation
Read full review
Microsoft
  • One, it's crazy lightweight, so compared to some of the competitors that we also have used with our security services, it's really lightweight and so I don't have a lot of overhead on the system that it's running on.
  • It does really fantastic PowerShell integration.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • use AI to review previous false negatives that contributed wrongly in the AI suggestion on the follow alerts
  • easily run a script based on values from an hash, ips, path inside the boxes on the behavioral tree
  • apply the remediation to a range of endpoint instead to only the endpoint of the current alert
  • use ajax for example to update the alert page automatically while actions are happening
  • for api have profiles that allow only get actions, or just post on some actions
  • create users in bulk
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It would be good to continue to minimize the amount of resources needed during a scan
  • Provide more integration with Outlook to scan attachments with a notification that everything is good
  • Provide a Click to Fix option when listing issues or high-risk problems on systems
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Cost add-ons for Security features is nickel and diming the process to keep pace with cybercrime. Limited Education budgets require us to be more pro-active in finding cost-effective measures to protect our devices, staff and students. Defender is a strong, well-featured product that is pricing itself out of the education market
Read full review
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
It offers multiple security features and integrates well with Microsoft ecosystems. A workflow for threat detection, investigation, automated remediation, and a centralized dashboard is an added advantage. This application is mainly designed for experienced users; new users may feel challenged.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint chugs along just fine no matter what we throw at it and what systems it's running on. It doesn't take up a lot of resources either, so that's welcomed.
Read full review
Performance
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is easy on memory and resources on clients.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
The first time I tried to onboard my macOS endpoints to MDE I struggled for quite a bit. I had to reach out to Microsoft's MDE support team. The tech was very helpful in walking me through the steps during a screen share session
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Deployment was handled by our team here and everything went pretty smoothly. We did have a few hiccups in our test group, but that only took a bit to get ironed out.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Bitdefender GravityZone combines multiple security services into a single platform to reduce the cost of building a trusted environment for endpoints. bit the IBM provides a vast support and always there to guide when in need With the majority of our users working in hybrid mode we needed a strong security control that could provide top-class protection with the minimum amount of False Positives (and, of course, of True Positives).
Read full review
Microsoft
Defender is far easier to deploy and manage than Sophos and tends to work without as many issues. The threat assessment portal provides an in-depth view of the organization's security posture, whereas Sophos only shows the patching status of the PCs. We did need Intune to get many of the control features (disabling USB drives) that Sophos offered out of the box.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is easily scaled from small orgs to giant enterprises.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • NOCs and SOCs heavily use IBM Security QRadar EDR and IBM Security QRadar EDR reduced labor costs to identify endpoint security threats and the treat remediation
  • IBM Security QRadar EDR offers a consistent approach to endpoint threat identification and resolution, reduces enterprise security operations support costs
  • In general, IBM Security QRadar EDR enhances enterprise security posture
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Reduced incidents of security breaches lead to lower remediation costs and avoid potential financial losses and reputational damage.
  • Reduces the need for additional third-party security solutions and training, thereby lowering overall security management costs.
  • Increased efficiency and productivity of IT staff lead to better allocation of resources and cost savings.
  • Reduces the risk of fines and sanctions associated with non-compliance, ensuring business continuity and protecting revenue.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots

Screenshot of Behavioral tree: 
A behavioral tree provides full alert and attack visibility.Screenshot of Behavioral tree storyline: 
A visual storyline is automatically created as an attack unfolds, including mapping to MITRE ATT&CK, for full visibility.Screenshot of Cyber Assistant alerts: 
The Cyber Assistant, an AI-powered alert management system, can autonomously handle alerts, reducing analysts’ workloads.Screenshot of Cyber Assistant recommends:
The Cyber Assistant learns from analyst decisions, then retains the intellectual capital and learned behaviors to make recommendations and help reduce false positives.Screenshot of Custom detection strategies: 
Detection Strategy (DeStra) scripting allows users to build custom detection strategies — beyond preconfigured models — to address compliance or company-specific requirements without the need to reboot the endpoint.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Screenshots

Screenshot of blocked activitiesScreenshot of Detects & respondsScreenshot of discovers vulnerabilityScreenshot of Eliminates blind spotsScreenshot of Risk management