IBM Security QRadar EDR vs. Qualys TruRisk Platform
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Security QRadar EDR | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users… | N/A |
Qualys TruRisk Platform | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | Qualys TruRisk Platform (formerly Qualys Cloud Platform, or Qualysguard), from San Francisco-based Qualys, is network security and vulnerability management software featuring app scanning and security, network device mapping and detection, vulnerability prioritization schedule and remediation, and other features to provide vulnerability management and network attack surface reduction. | N/A |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 11 Answers | 85% Would buy again 17 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
88% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 87% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 11 Answers | 85% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 15 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | 92% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 8.6 |
| Usability | - | 2.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 5.0 |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots |








