IBM Security QRadar EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Security QRadar EDR | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users… | N/A |
Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) solutions apply proactive threat intelligence and defenses across the entire attack lifecycle to keep organizations safer and more resilient. | N/A |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 11 Answers | 80% Would buy again 12 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
88% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 93% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 11 Answers | 80% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 5.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 10.0 |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Screenshots |












