IBM Security QRadar SIEM vs. Juniper Secure Analytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
IBM Security QRadar is security information and event management (SIEM) Software.N/A
Juniper Secure Analytics
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Juniper Network Secure Analytics (JSA) is a network security management platform that facilitates the comparison of data from the broadest set of devices and network traffic. It combines log management, SIEM, and network behavior anomaly detection (NBAD), into a single integrated end-to-end network security management solution. The JSA solution is available via appliances, and also via a virtual edition.N/A
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar SIEMJuniper Secure Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Security QRadar SIEMJuniper Secure Analytics
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Security QRadar SIEMJuniper Secure Analytics
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
IBM Security QRadar SIEMJuniper Secure Analytics
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
8.7
60 Ratings
11% above category average
Juniper Secure Analytics
9.5
1 Ratings
19% above category average
Centralized event and log data collection9.927 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Correlation8.960 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management9.527 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Deployment flexibility7.927 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools8.456 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces7.660 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection9.625 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Data integration/API management9.07 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining8.339 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds9.240 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation7.75 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management7.838 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching8.97 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Security QRadar SIEMJuniper Secure Analytics
Small Businesses
AlienVault USM
AlienVault USM
Score 8.0 out of 10
AlienVault USM
AlienVault USM
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise
Score 8.4 out of 10
Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise
Score 8.4 out of 10
Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Security QRadar SIEMJuniper Secure Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(81 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(55 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.3
(51 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Security QRadar SIEMJuniper Secure Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
QRadar is very well suited on environments where there are not multiple tenants or domains, we do have success on this kind of scenario. IBM Security QRadar SIEM is less appropriate for environments with multiple tenants, specially when each tenant represent a different End Costumer (such as for MSSP companies), those environments require a high amount of rules and building blocks replications, since each tenant will have its own "BB definitions", servers, rules exception, etc. Also, some information, such as EPS count or EPS dropped are generated by QRadar's own log sources, which takes place on default domain, therefore users associated with different domain can not have access to those logs, even when the information is related to other domain's environment. For example, even if Event Collector 1 is associated to Domain A, the log informing its dropped EPS is generated by System notification, log source that must be associated to Default domain.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
This is an amazing tool if you have a Juniper infrastructure. It has served us well in dealing with networking monitoring, security event analysis, and analyzing all the data that transverses our network. We haven't run into any situations where this isn't a good product to utilize unless we are dealing with other manufacturers like Cisco products.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Enables identification and prioritization of vulnerabilities in IT infrastructure for corrective action.
  • Facilitates security incident investigation and forensic analysis.
  • Provides a real-time view of security events, enabling immediate incident response.
  • Can integrate with external threat intelligence sources to enrich data and improve threat detection.
  • Enables the generation of detailed and customized reports.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
  • Analytics.
  • Network monitoring/behavior.
  • Security issue detection.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Need to spend more time configuring the system to properly interpret and normalize different type of data collected from multiple resources.
  • While Rule creation QRadar uses that rules to detect security threats and generate alerts, but to creating and managing rules is bit complex & tedious work to complete.
  • IBM Security QRadar SIEM is excellent in handling large & complex systems that requires in-depth knowledge and extensive training to configure and maintain the system which includes upgrading, optimization of performance & issue troubleshooting.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
  • User training.
  • Capability for other products.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
With the arrival of IBM Security QRadar SIEM at our company, we have a better vision of all the security needs that may arise, it is a very safe software to use that prevents threats from damaging our IT environment, it is impossible to change it for another software.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
A very special system to use without problems, the process is very genuine and does not require complicated procedures.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
Customer support is Good of IBM, While Using IBM QRadar its deployment is to slow and suddenly stop working and crashed we have contacted IBM Support and Rised a Ticket within a few minute we get call back from customer support and Query Resolved by them Fast And Rapid Support of Ibm
Read full review
Juniper Networks
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
IBM Qradar takes the best from its competitors. Reliable and stable but sometimes very expensive, the SIEM from IBM offers a wide range of scenarios in which the customers can suite and size their own infrastructures. IBM Qradar doesn't really needs to stack up againt its competitors because it already sets an example in the SIEM world.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
Not even a close comparison between these two. Juniper is an amazing product with unlimited capabilities while FortiSIEM wasn't quite ready to be deployed. We like how much time, effort, and energy went into the development of Juniper's product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Offense investigation was really helped in tackling the incidents. It was accurate and brief
  • The automation with IBM resilient (SOAR) was a milestone in elimination of user mistakes
  • The X-Force threat intelligence supported us in getting the work done without any 3rd party enterprise OSINT database
Read full review
Juniper Networks
  • Found issues before our other tools.
Read full review
ScreenShots