IBM Security QRadar SIEM vs. Microsoft Security Copilot

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
IBM Security QRadar is security information and event management (SIEM) Software.N/A
Microsoft Security Copilot
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Security Copilot helps security and IT teams to protect organizations at the speed and scale of AI. It is available in a standalone experience or embedded into other Microsoft Security products.N/A
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar SIEMMicrosoft Security Copilot
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Security QRadar SIEMMicrosoft Security Copilot
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Security QRadar SIEMMicrosoft Security Copilot
Features
IBM Security QRadar SIEMMicrosoft Security Copilot
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
8.6
69 Ratings
8% above category average
Microsoft Security Copilot
-
Ratings
Centralized event and log data collection9.927 Ratings00 Ratings
Correlation8.769 Ratings00 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management9.527 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment flexibility7.827 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools8.865 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces7.469 Ratings00 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection9.725 Ratings00 Ratings
Data integration/API management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining7.748 Ratings00 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds8.149 Ratings00 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management8.047 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching8.97 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Security QRadar SIEMMicrosoft Security Copilot
Small Businesses
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 7.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.3 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.3 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Security QRadar SIEMMicrosoft Security Copilot
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(89 ratings)
7.9
(13 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.4
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(2 ratings)
7.6
(13 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(62 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(58 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Security QRadar SIEMMicrosoft Security Copilot
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
I would only recommend IBM Security QRadar SIEM in a few situations. For one, it's very easy to setup and use if all your log sources are generic from known vendors. It's also significantly cheaper than Splunk, which is nice if you're trying to save money or be more efficient. I would not recommend IBM Security QRadar SIEM for environments with a lot of custom logs and complicated detection requirements.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Security Copilot is well-suited for environments where security teams face high alert volumes and need rapid triage. It is effective during active threat response, helping us establish timelines and suggest remediation steps quickly. Copilot also excels in executive reporting, generating clear summaries for leadership without much effort. Security Copilot is less effective outside of Microsoft's ecosystem because it doesn't integrate well with other products.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Enables identification and prioritization of vulnerabilities in IT infrastructure for corrective action.
  • Facilitates security incident investigation and forensic analysis.
  • Provides a real-time view of security events, enabling immediate incident response.
  • Can integrate with external threat intelligence sources to enrich data and improve threat detection.
  • Enables the generation of detailed and customized reports.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Quickly analyze alerts by doings simple analysis or from different inbuilt security tools.
  • Smart threat investigation use AI for analyzing user behavior, activity and network logs.
  • Automated generate reports and gives the steps to fix the threats.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Need to spend more time configuring the system to properly interpret and normalize different type of data collected from multiple resources.
  • While Rule creation QRadar uses that rules to detect security threats and generate alerts, but to creating and managing rules is bit complex & tedious work to complete.
  • IBM Security QRadar SIEM is excellent in handling large & complex systems that requires in-depth knowledge and extensive training to configure and maintain the system which includes upgrading, optimization of performance & issue troubleshooting.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It is super expensive, which can be a turn off for many small businesses looking to leverage its capabilities
  • It can be very complex to set up, with many prerequisite steps that need to happen prior to being able to use it
  • With all AI-based solutions, it can sometimes hallucinate, but that is to be expected at some level
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
QRadar is an established and stable product, we have been using it for many years and want to continue to focus on it. Anyone who has used the product and knows it knows how reliable it is and how it facilitates continuous monitoring of threats from outside and inside. it is an exceptional product that is very useful for us.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
As a grade I give 8 as QRadar is not easy to learn. It requires some time to master it. It also needs a team of people actively working on the product. Once you learn to use it the software works very well and it is easy to correlate and understand detected threats. It only takes time to learn how to use it well and configure it properly.
Read full review
Microsoft
Anyone can use it. Easy to prompt, also capabilities to become advance with custom agents. It can become custom to your workflow. Many people will have their unique experiences to share and results are generally positive. This is a growth in the product from the effect of community and adoption/usage.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
Customer support is Good of IBM, While Using IBM QRadar its deployment is to slow and suddenly stop working and crashed we have contacted IBM Support and Rised a Ticket within a few minute we get call back from customer support and Query Resolved by them Fast And Rapid Support of Ibm
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
IBM
The training was very useful and the people who taught us were very knowledgeable. Although the software may initially seem difficult to learn they made things much easier for us.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Online Training
IBM
The training was very useful and the people who taught us were very knowledgeable. Although the software may initially seem difficult to learn they made things much easier for us.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
Initial patience is required to learn how to use the product, and it takes a dedicated team to use it. One person is not enough, and it's not enough to just set it up and check it once in a while. It has to be used daily and kept under control to be used effectively
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
IBM Qradar takes the best from its competitors. Reliable and stable but sometimes very expensive, the SIEM from IBM offers a wide range of scenarios in which the customers can suite and size their own infrastructures. IBM Qradar doesn't really needs to stack up againt its competitors because it already sets an example in the SIEM world.
Read full review
Microsoft
My usage of other products is based on SIEM tools. So far, Microsoft Security Copilot is the only product I've seen that works across multiple technologies/products to provide full visibility into security tooling using AI. I know other vendors are working towards this, but Microsoft has definitely taken a lead.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Offense investigation was really helped in tackling the incidents. It was accurate and brief
  • The automation with IBM resilient (SOAR) was a milestone in elimination of user mistakes
  • The X-Force threat intelligence supported us in getting the work done without any 3rd party enterprise OSINT database
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Helps reduce time spent creating a baseline script.
  • Some errors get corrected but then get reintroduced while adding functionality.
  • I noticed that when using this for PowerShell it will sometimes have you install the module in the script without verifying if it is already installed. You must read the script before executing.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Security QRadar SIEM Screenshots

Screenshot of QRadar SIEM Cloud native- Threat intelligence preview

Microsoft Security Copilot Screenshots

Screenshot of Defender USX guided responseScreenshot of Defender USX incident summaryScreenshot of the homepage - capabilities menuScreenshot of the homepageScreenshot of MDTI threat intelScreenshot of session - incident summary