TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Storage Protect

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AIBM Storage Protect (formerly IBM Spectrum Protect, or Tivoli Storage Manager) provides data resilience for physical file servers, virtual environments, and applications. Organizations can scale up to manage billions of objects per backup server.N/A

    Nasuni

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AThe Nasuni File Data Platform is a cloud-native suite of services offering user productivity, business continuity, data intelligence, cloud choice, and simplified global infrastructure. The platform and its add-on services replace traditional file infrastructure, including network attached storage (NAS), back-up, and DR, with a cloud-scale solution. By consolidating file data in easily expandable cloud object storage from Azure, AWS, Google Cloud, and others, Nasuni aims to become a cloud-native…N/A
    Pricing
    IBM Storage ProtectNasuni
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Storage ProtectNasuni
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM Storage ProtectNasuni
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Nasuni
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    89%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM Storage ProtectNasuni
    Data Center Backup
    Comparison of Data Center Backup features of IBM Storage Protect and Nasuni
    Feature
    IBM Storage Protect
    8.1
    6 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Nasuni
    -
    Ratings
    Universal recovery8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Instant recovery7.36 Ratings00 Ratings
    Recovery verification8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Business application protection8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple backup destinations8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
    Incremental backup identification8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
    Backup to the cloud8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deduplication and file compression8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
    Snapshots8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Flexible deployment7.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management dashboard7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform support8.56 Ratings00 Ratings
    Retention options7.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Encryption9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of IBM Storage Protect and Nasuni
    Feature
    IBM Storage Protect
    -
    Ratings
    Nasuni
    9.4
    2 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Versioning00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Video files00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Audio files00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Document collaboration00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Access control00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    File search00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Device sync00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Cloud Storage Security & Administration
    Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of IBM Storage Protect and Nasuni
    Feature
    IBM Storage Protect
    -
    Ratings
    Nasuni
    8.3
    2 Ratings
    4% below category average
    User and role management00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    File organization00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Device management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Cloud Storage Platform
    Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of IBM Storage Protect and Nasuni
    Feature
    IBM Storage Protect
    -
    Ratings
    Nasuni
    9.3
    2 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Performance00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Reliability00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Storage Reports00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM Storage ProtectNasuni
    Small Businesses
    BDRShield
    Score6.5 out of 10
    IDrive Online Backup and Object Storage e2
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Bacula Enterprise
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Apple iCloud
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Bacula Enterprise
    Score8.6 out of 10
    ownCloud
    Score9.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM Storage ProtectNasuni
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (11 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.7
    (5 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.2
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Storage ProtectNasuni
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    IBM Storage Protect is well-suited for large heterogenous environments, with skilled IT staff on-hand. You need a person (or group of people) to monitor day-to-day operations, tweak schedules where needed and be mindful of things that might go wrong. It is also well-suited if you have other IBM products that integrate well with Storage Protect, like Storage Protect Plus or IBM Defender. It is less suited for small companies, with only one person responsible for IT. Employing Storage Protect would be overkill and use too much time of the administrator.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nasuni
    Well suited if you have a lot of data that doesn't need to be stored and read right away. I think even if you don't have much data, you can still use it for it's intended purpose to great effect, but think of it as the more data you have, the even better it will work. I don't think it would be particularly useful if you already have a slick file restore system in place and you don't need to store your data elsewhere with redundancy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Tight integration with Db2. As an IBM product, it works seamlessly with Db2. You can query what is stored in TSM via Db2 itself. You can also use DB scripts to maintain the items being stored there.
    • Like most of its competitors, Tivoli handles deduplication well.
    • Provides a GUI for browsing and maintaining items stored there. I rarely use this feature, due to the next item I will post:
    • Command-line interface directly from my Db2 database servers.
    • Both client and server-side deduplication, compression and encryption are available.
    • If the requirements are zLinux and DB2 support then it's the most solid solution.
    • Can be complex to implement, but once up and running, it is rock-solid and immensely scalable.
    • Scalability is huge. Can be added onto easily.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nasuni
    • The management console is extremely simple and easy to navigate, making common tasks easy to do.
    • Our storage appliance is configured to snapshot data several times an hour, making the risk of data loss very low.
    • Data restores are very intuitive, and take seconds to initiate regardless of whether it is one file or 300GB of data. We have successfully restored many Gigs of data in minutes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Deployment and configuration is not easy for an unexperienced IBM Spectrum Protect administrator
    • Operations center uses a lot of data and needs a lot of storage for larger environments
    • Have not seen a redbook about it in the past 10 years
    Read full review
    Nasuni
    • Better analytics when issues arise.
    • Better onboarding documentation.
    • Real-time monitoring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    Not required, company closed. TSM is not used in my current role at my current job.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nasuni
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    IBM
    In the present, a backup solution is a must-have, but then companies start using a solution for virtual machines, another solution for bare-metal servers, and another solution for their ERP. By using Spectrum Protect you can have all of that in a single pane of glass. This way you can have a simple recovery plan for all your information assets.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nasuni
    As I mentioned, the user interface is amazing and straight forward. It's very easy to learn how to configure and restore files. I would like a bit more reporting, especially in terms of live reporting and monitoring. The support is great when you have a question on how to do something, which helps with usability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Nasuni
    Again, it may have a little to do with the size and speed of your own environment, but we've been nothing but pleased with the speed of access of the files - even pulling old files from the cloud storage. Recovery of huge and many data files is a bit slow if you don't have the specs of the filer up to snuff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    The few times we've called for support we eventually got an answer, but it's IBM and a very big company and getting to a support agent is hard.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nasuni
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    IBM Spectrum Protect is related to the other IBM Spectrum products listed because it is part of the suite and is also the main backup product for backup and restoration of information. With Veeam it is related as they present competence in different lines of technology, often the integration of both tools can be the best solution for clients looking for a successful backup strategy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nasuni
    The technical support and escalation path for Nasuni is much more reliable and efficient. No getting transferred to various teams. Often times, the person who answers your call is able to resolve your issue. If they cannot, they get the case assigned to the appropriate engineer right away. Time to close has always been very good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    IBM
    Not at the moment, but it can leverage the billing outcomes as per the scales.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nasuni
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Tivoli does well running file-level backups, but Exchange is clunky and restores are really hard. With no SharePoint agent, if you use SharePoint you will need another product like AvePoint DocAve. The web-based GUI console is MUCH improved over earlier versions, but you will still need to be a command-line guru to make Tivoli do everything, and local (node) config files still rule. This product was originally ported from Unix and retains may of its 'nix roots.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Nasuni
    • Dramatically reduced time spent managing our storage platform. Quotas and reporting tools take all the guesswork out of data growth. Updates are easy to deploy. Time freed up can be used for more user-facing activities that we consider more valuable to the organization.
    • The overall stability of the platform has been very good. We have been running on the same hardware for the past four years without any performance issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots