Pricey for the feature set, but solid at what it does.
Overall Satisfaction with Tivoli Storage Manager
We use it for file-level backups for all Windows and Linux server (275+), and Exchange mailbox-level backups. We have a 3-year recovery SLA for deleted files, and Tivoli makes retention policy configuration pretty easy.
Pros
- File-level backups on all servers.
- Granular retention policy. Some files we keep 3 years, others 30 days.
Cons
- Exchange agent is a bolt-on that is not manageable from the console. You have to use an MMC plug-in on the Exchange server.
- No SharePoint agent (anymore... there used to be one).
- Tivoli is not cheap. If you need it, spend the cash, but know there are less expensive alternatives.
- Veeam Availability Suite and Commvault Complete Backup & Recovery
Tivoli no longer has a SharePoint agent, others do. We are looking at a product that is agentless (runs in VMWare) to relieve our staff from installing and maintaining agents on 300 servers.
Do you think IBM Storage Protect delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with IBM Storage Protect's feature set?
No
Did IBM Storage Protect live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of IBM Storage Protect go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy IBM Storage Protect again?
No
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation