TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IFS Applications vs. Quadient Accounts Receivable

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IFS Applications

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AIFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A

    Quadient Accounts Receivable

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AQuadient Accounts Receivable, formerly YayPay but acquired by Quadient in 2020, is presented as a complete accounts receivable management platform that gives user's teams more time, more insight, and more control.N/A
    Pricing
    IFS ApplicationsQuadient Accounts Receivable
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IFS ApplicationsQuadient Accounts Receivable
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    IFS ApplicationsQuadient Accounts Receivable
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    4.8
    3 Ratings
    44% below category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Pay calculation8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration7.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Direct deposit files6.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    8.7
    5 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    API for custom integration8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
    Plug-ins8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.9
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Single sign-on capability10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions9.85 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    8.8
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards8.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports8.35 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
    Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    7.5
    5 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Accounts payable9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Accounts receivable9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Global Financial Support9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Primary and Secondary Ledgers9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journals and Reconciliations9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configurable Accounting8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standardized Processes9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Management
    Comparison of Inventory Management features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.1
    5 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Inventory tracking9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic reordering9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location management9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Management
    Comparison of Order Management features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    6.3
    5 Ratings
    23% below category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Pricing9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order entry8.25 Ratings00 Ratings
    Credit card processing8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost of goods sold8.35 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Orchestration7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Subledger and Financial Process
    Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.9
    4 Ratings
    64% below category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Billing Management8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cash and Asset Management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Travel & Expense Management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Period Close9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Financial Management
    Comparison of Project Financial Management features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    2.7
    1 Ratings
    95% below category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Budgeting and Forecasting3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Costing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost Capture5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Capital Project Management2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customer Contract Compliance2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Execution Management
    Comparison of Project Execution Management features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.5
    4 Ratings
    67% below category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Project Planning and Scheduling9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Task Insight for Project Managers8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Mobile Functionality7.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Definable Resource Pools8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Grants Management
    Comparison of Grants Management features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.3
    2 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Award Lifecycle Management9.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Procurement
    Comparison of Procurement features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.5
    4 Ratings
    68% below category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Bids Analyzed and Compared9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Authoring8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Repository8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supplier Management9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Risk Management
    Comparison of Risk Management features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    5.0
    4 Ratings
    30% below category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Risk Repository8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Control Management8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Control Efficiency Assessments8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue Detection7.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Remediation and Certification8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Logistics
    Comparison of Logistics features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    7.8
    4 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Transportation Planning and Optimization8.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Transportation Execution Management9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Trade and Customs Management8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Fulfillment Management7.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Warehouse Workforce Management8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing
    Comparison of Manufacturing features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    6.8
    4 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Production Process Design9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Production Management9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration Management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Work Execution9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing Costs9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supply Chain
    Comparison of Supply Chain features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.1
    4 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Forecasting8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Planning9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Performance Monitoring9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product Lifecycle Management
    Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    4.8
    4 Ratings
    42% below category average
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    -
    Ratings
    Proposal Management8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product Master Data Management8.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Accounts Receivable
    Comparison of Accounts Receivable features of IFS Applications and Quadient Accounts Receivable
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    -
    Ratings
    Quadient Accounts Receivable
    7.5
    2 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Invoice Control00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Payment Tracking00 Ratings7.92 Ratings
    Credit Management00 Ratings5.12 Ratings
    Aging Reports00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Customer Statements00 Ratings8.12 Ratings
    Automatic Reminders00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Payment Reconciliation00 Ratings7.42 Ratings
    Dispute Resolution00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Financial Reports00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Integration with Accounting Systems:00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IFS ApplicationsQuadient Accounts Receivable
    Small Businesses
    Zoho One
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Zoho One
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score4.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IFS ApplicationsQuadient Accounts Receivable
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (5 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.5
    (4 ratings)
    8.1
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IFS ApplicationsQuadient Accounts Receivable
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IFS
    Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quadient
    Great for automating dunning letters and standard customer communications. Great for dashboards for the collections teams. Easy to manage reporting that syncs with our in-house ERP, NetSuite. Senior management can review the dashboard to monitor overall performance. Can be hard to maintain a separate login for another ERP system.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IFS
    • It supports the web version in most later versions.
    • It provides various mobile versions of the applications as mobile apps to cater various areas.
    • IFS Applications allows easy configurations of the application without going for costly customization.
    • It covers almost every areas of an industrial company so any other third party applications are minimum.
    • It allows safer and easier built-in options for integrations capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quadient
    • Self serve and easy access to customer documents
    • provides a full audit of all collection notes for any invoice in a single repository of data
    • Allows your collection team to become more proactive on issues than reactive - the automated services Quadient offers remove a lot of the manual human tasks
    Read full review
    Cons
    IFS
    • Handling massive volumes of data can be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quadient
    • Being able to tell clients which invoices were applied to for payment application
    • More analytical tools
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Quadient
    Yay Pay has saved a lot of time. Integrates the billing and invoicing departments and is helpful to the revenue team to track customers and timing of payments. The AR and billing teams can share information with others and allows sharing of information that previously was hard to manage. Yay Pay integrates very well with Net Suite
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IFS
    The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
    Read full review
    Quadient
    I love the usability, the way the information is divided is very well though out and it flows nicely. The only thing I would point out is that sometimes the search engine show no results and when I know that cannot be correct, I refresh the page and the information shows up. It would be nice if if the connection is not good or the website is not sure if the information is correct, it would tell me, not say it is not there
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IFS
    We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
    Read full review
    Quadient
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IFS
    IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
    Read full review
    Quadient
    Very similar to Tesorio - more cost effective but less savvy in forecasting piece. Quadient customer service is A+. Much more functional workflow capability than NetSuite
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IFS
    • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
    • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
    • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Quadient
    • Decrease in our DSO which was relatively high before
    • Ease of use by our customers to gather statements or invoices
    • Ease of use platform for all employees
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IFS Applications Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    Quadient Accounts Receivable Screenshots

    Screenshot of a dashboard showing where cash can be allocated back to the ERP automatically - whether remittance data is included or not - allowing for increased accuracy, higher productivity, and reduced risk of manual errors.Screenshot of an example customizable resolution and escalation workflow.Screenshot of an example custom report. These combine AR data with machine learning to predict cash flow, build credit score cards and assess payor behavior. Advanced reporting and machine learning capabilities can enable B2B finance teams to make better business decisions.Screenshot of the advanced credit module used to mitigate credit risk while driving more reliable sales for B2B finance teams.Screenshot of an example configurable, and automated, collection workflow.Screenshot of the multi-channel and multi-format invoice delivery feature that enables users contact customers, in their preferred format, for a better payment experience.