TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Infor Cloverleaf Integration Platform vs. PrestoDB (or Presto)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Infor Cloverleaf Integration Platform

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ACloverleaf improves healthcare outcomes and operations by connecting organizations and streamlining interoperability—with FHIR and API management support.N/A

    PrestoDB (or Presto)

    Score10 out of 10
    N/APresto is an open source SQL query engine designed to run queries on data stored in Hadoop or in traditional databases. Teradata supported development of Presto followed the acquisition of Hadapt and Revelytix.N/A
    Pricing
    Infor Cloverleaf Integration PlatformPrestoDB (or Presto)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Infor Cloverleaf Integration PlatformPrestoDB (or Presto)
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Infor Cloverleaf Integration PlatformPrestoDB (or Presto)
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon RDS
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    SingleStore
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    SAP IQ
    Score5.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Infor Cloverleaf Integration PlatformPrestoDB (or Presto)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.8
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Infor Cloverleaf Integration PlatformPrestoDB (or Presto)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Infor
    Web API integration, healthcare integration is best suited in Cloverleaf. It is robust. So it's perfectly well suited where infrastructure is advanced and up to date.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Presto is for interactive simple queries, where Hive is for reliable processing. If you have a fact-dim join, presto is great..however for fact-fact joins presto is not the solution.. Presto is a great replacement for proprietary technology like Vertica
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Infor
    • Translation and support of all HL7 version data.
    • Easy database integration.
    • Debuggers while translation of data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Linking, embedding links and adding images is easy enough.
    • Once you have become familiar with the interface, Presto becomes very quick & easy to use (but, you have to practice & repeat to know what you are doing - it is not as intuitive as one would hope).
    • Organizing & design is fairly simple with click & drag parameters.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Infor
    • High cost if one needs to migrate to another environment like cloud.
    • Customer engagement. We are not yet fully aware of all services and capabilities Infor provides.
    • Does not offer bundled deals. Each solutions is sold separately.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Presto was not designed for large fact fact joins. This is by design as presto does not leverage disk and used memory for processing which in turn makes it fast.. However, this is a tradeoff..in an ideal world, people would like to use one system for all their use cases, and presto should get exhaustive by solving this problem.
    • Resource allocation is not similar to YARN and presto has a priority queue based query resource allocation..so a query that takes long takes longer...this might be alleviated by giving some more control back to the user to define priority/override.
    • UDF Support is not available in presto. You will have to write your own functions..while this is good for performance, it comes at a huge overhead of building exclusively for presto and not being interoperable with other systems like Hive, SparkSQL etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Infor
    Good support for what is needed or to be resolved. They have knowledge and required information when you approach them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Infor
    Easy to implement. Cost effective. Less complex. Less support and maintenance required comparatively.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Presto is good for a templated design appeal. You cannot be too creative via this interface - but, the layout and options make the finalized visual product appealing to customers. The other design products I use are for different purposes and not really comparable to Presto.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Infor
    • Return wise it has a huge impact since a lot of healthcare data is integrated.
    • It gives us a different option to be offered to our clients as compared with other integration engine tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Presto has helped scale Uber's interactive data needs. We have migrated a lot out of proprietary tech like Vertica.
    • Presto has helped build data driven applications on its stack than maintain a separate online/offline stack.
    • Presto has helped us build data exploration tools by leveraging it's power of interactive and is immensely valuable for data scientists.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots