Our previous systmes are the brandmaker PIM and DAM. I have used it for quite a while and the advantages on a technical architecture perspective is that importing of products from Brandmaker it needs to go first on a SFTP server before it goes on our website and that brings us …
When I compared these other PIM platforms, I found several were not true PIM systems. Although they solved for some significant syndication challenges, they did not have the ability to build a relational databased across products and categories. Furthermore, the interface is …
inRiver [PIM] seems to be a mid-pricepoint program. The UI is certainly the highlight but the functionality seems to lack when it comes to mass-maintenance of large amounts of information that reaches across Items/Products/Categories/Assets.
inRiver [PIM] is pretty easy to use. I can see a company with a more narrow product selection benefiting from this PIM. The challenge comes with the more SKUs and categories the company offers. Without our 3rd party implementor creating specialized imports for us, we would be having a difficult time managing mass data updates.
inRiver has been both helpful and responsive to our needs. Their customer service and ticketing system are top-notch - timely communications and followup
It's really easy to use. There are no confusion on the user experience and the interface, very straight forward. If you want to change environments it's a simple dropdown. If you want to publish or put an item to draft it's just a simple click of a button of the family/item's status
Our previous systmes are the brandmaker PIM and DAM. I have used it for quite a while and the advantages on a technical architecture perspective is that importing of products from Brandmaker it needs to go first on a SFTP server before it goes on our website and that brings us more maintenance work