Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
InRule
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
InRule Technology in Chicago, Illinois offers business rules management software.N/A
MLReef
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
MLReef is a Machine Learning development platform that aims to democratize ML innovation across the entire organization. Distributed ML Development: - up to 5X in ML development throughput - up to 85% less dependency on internal data science capacity - Distributed workload on complex data tasks with seamless involvable domain experts - Higher acceptance of deploye models ad development is a joint task Q: What is Distributed ML…N/A
TensorFlow
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
TensorFlow is an open-source machine learning software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. It was originally developed by Google.N/A
Pricing
InRuleMLReefTensorFlow
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
InRuleMLReefTensorFlow
Free Trial
YesYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
InRuleMLReefTensorFlow
Best Alternatives
InRuleMLReefTensorFlow
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.9 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.9 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
InRuleMLReefTensorFlow
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(3 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
6.0
(15 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
InRuleMLReefTensorFlow
Likelihood to Recommend
InRule Technology
With InRule, we are expecting to be able to move business logic out of the developer domain and back into the business domain. Business logic is currently captured in UI (data validation) and middleware layers. These are areas in any application where leveraging InRule's capabilities allow for changes in business logic to be made with little or no IT involvement.
Read full review
MLReef
Works well if you have to involve different roles in different organizations in a project. Less suited when you have a complex system of custom developed tools
Read full review
Open Source
TensorFlow is great for most deep learning purposes. This is especially true in two domains: 1. Computer vision: image classification, object detection and image generation via generative adversarial networks 2. Natural language processing: text classification and generation. The good community support often means that a lot of off-the-shelf models can be used to prove a concept or test an idea quickly. That, and Google's promotion of Colab means that ideas can be shared quite freely. Training, visualizing and debugging models is very easy in TensorFlow, compared to other platforms (especially the good old Caffe days). In terms of productionizing, it's a bit of a mixed bag. In our case, most of our feature building is performed via Apache Spark. This means having to convert Parquet (columnar optimized) files to a TensorFlow friendly format i.e., protobufs. The lack of good JVM bindings mean that our projects end up being a mix of Python and Scala. This makes it hard to reuse some of the tooling and support we wrote in Scala. This is where MXNet shines better (though its Scala API could do with more work).
Read full review
Pros
InRule Technology
  • It is easy to tweak business rule parameters.
  • Create new logic with low barriers.
Read full review
MLReef
  • Helps us to take on more client projects
  • Can be used by data analysts as well as casual users
Read full review
Open Source
  • A vast library of functions for all kinds of tasks - Text, Images, Tabular, Video etc.
  • Amazing community helps developers obtain knowledge faster and get unblocked in this active development space.
  • Integration of high-level libraries like Keras and Estimators make it really simple for a beginner to get started with neural network based models.
Read full review
Cons
InRule Technology
  • Needs more debugging capabilities.
Read full review
MLReef
  • Out of the box support for major cloud vendors
Read full review
Open Source
  • RNNs are still a bit lacking, compared to Theano.
  • Cannot handle sequence inputs
  • Theano is perhaps a bit faster and eats up less memory than TensorFlow on a given GPU, perhaps due to element-wise ops. Tensorflow wins for multi-GPU and “compilation” time.
Read full review
Usability
InRule Technology
No answers on this topic
MLReef
No answers on this topic
Open Source
Support of multiple components and ease of development.
Read full review
Support Rating
InRule Technology
InRule's Support Portal provides a "one stop shop" for submitting support questions, accessing training information, managing licenses, and getting updates on InRule's roadmap.
Read full review
MLReef
No answers on this topic
Open Source
Community support for TensorFlow is great. There's a huge community that truly loves the platform and there are many examples of development in TensorFlow. Often, when a new good technique is published, there will be a TensorFlow implementation not long after. This makes it quick to ally the latest techniques from academia straight to production-grade systems. Tooling around TensorFlow is also good. TensorBoard has been such a useful tool, I can't imagine how hard it would be to debug a deep neural network gone wrong without TensorBoard.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
InRule Technology
No answers on this topic
MLReef
No answers on this topic
Open Source
Use of cloud for better execution power is recommended.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
InRule Technology
InRule offers a more organized software design, a well-structured framework in design, and is easier for new users to start contributing given documentation. Drools is spreadsheet-based and lacking the capability to do really advanced pseudo-programming.
Read full review
MLReef
No answers on this topic
Open Source
Keras is built on top of TensorFlow, but it is much simpler to use and more Python style friendly, so if you don't want to focus on too many details or control and not focus on some advanced features, Keras is one of the best options, but as far as if you want to dig into more, for sure TensorFlow is the right choice
Read full review
Return on Investment
InRule Technology
  • It is always reliable and efficient.
  • Has won customers over.
Read full review
MLReef
  • We can handle 4 to 6 times more projects at the same time with our team
  • We stay engaged with our customers well beyond the project duration
Read full review
Open Source
  • Learning is s bit difficult takes lot of time.
  • Developing or implementing the whole neural network is time consuming with this, as you have to write everything.
  • Once you have learned this, it make your job very easy of getting the good result.
Read full review
ScreenShots

MLReef Screenshots

Screenshot of ML Pipeline creation - from fully flexible git repositories to addressable, explorable and easy accessible drag-and-drop elementsScreenshot of A knowledgebase for your organization: ML Projects and AI Modules (scripts)Screenshot of Full version control and transparent experiment trackingScreenshot of Repositories to manage your scripts (SCM) and data (pipelines)Screenshot of Manage your team, groups and projects with access rights and granular permissions