Intapp Conflicts vs. Oracle BPM Suite

Intapp is great for storing your conflicts database and files associated with matters. I find that its user interface is really friendly. I have yet to see an analyst that does not quickly learn how it functions. Going through files can be a little bit more onerous because the way they are listed and naming conventions can vary, but overall I find it a very helpful tool for running conflicts

Incentivized

Oracle BPM is part of [the] Middleware SOA suite. Hence Oracle BPM can be directly installed with Oracle WebLogic. Oracle BPM comes with [a] standard out of the box portal. Recently Oracle has introduced another Web based portal to design processes. Standard Oracle BPM workflows can be created using the Jdeveloper. Deploying BPM apps are easy to deploy over Weblogic. All features with Weblogic can be utilized with Oracle BPM. Oracle BPM is [a] standard Middleware product and can make excellent front end applications.

Incentivized

• Allows for easy review of conflicts within the database
• Has a very friendly user interface
• Easy ability to communicate with downstream teams and local offices
• Customizable searches with search parameters (default settings)

Incentivized

• It can easily integrate with other Oracle products and even 3rd party software via adapters
• It scales quite well and can handle the biggest enterprise level solutions we throw at it
• The ability to use previous requirements as templates is invaluable

Incentivized

• Dark Mode option would make for a friendlier user experience
• Being able to paste outside information directly from copying (i.e., do not have to use a notepad to avoid formatting issues)
• An easily accessible user guide (one click access)

Incentivized

• Extremely complicated to work with. The WYSIWYG is of no help either since it very buggy and poorly designed. If you are a business or functional user, you will have a hard time using the application.
• The Oracle's "Using" and "Implementing" guides are nearly useless with no examples and case studies and there is no documentation available to learn or understand the process.
• Very few skilled developers are available in market who really understand how to implement Oracle BPM suite.

Incentivized

In many scenarios it should have provided more features. It took a lot of effort while debugging, making it difficult to maintain.

Not easy to debug errors.

Overall satisfactory

I have only ever used Intapp in the law firm setting. My only other experience is using legal and research search engines, which do not fit within the realm of Intapp per se.

Incentivized

All are fairly similar in capabilities, but the Oracle BPM Suite has good support for BPMN 2.0, integrates well with open standards and has an excellent design/development platform when compared to the other BPM vendors. The Oracle BPM Suite integrates well with the complimentary Oracle Fusion Middleware products that typically accompany a BPM implementation, making it a part of an overall well integrated solution set. Oracle BPM also has very good monitoring, reporting and analytics support built-in.

• It helps reduce risk to our firm
• It has allowed us to have the forms we use be interconnected, so we avoid wasting time on submission of separate forms
• The report we have now also allows Partners to review conflicts on their own even without us providing a summary (helpful for afterhours for the Partners)

Incentivized

• When we moved to Oracle BPM many years ago, it was a huge uplift for our business processes because we didn't have any tool to model flows except Outlook and Excel.
• We established and streamlined the manufacturing workflows that were needed with the growth of the business.
• We discovered after a while that the ROI was not great since along with the cost of the tools, we had to account the cost of development from the software team too. It took a lot of time to deliver our first automations due to the big learning curve needed for Oracle BPM.

Incentivized