Interfy vs. OpenText Web CMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Interfy
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with TeamSite, users can: Capture diverse digital audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…N/A
Pricing
InterfyOpenText Web CMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
InterfyOpenText Web CMS
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
InterfyOpenText Web CMS
Considered Both Products
Interfy

No answer on this topic

OpenText Web CMS
Chose OpenText Web CMS
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
OpenText TeamSite has been more powerful and resourceful as compared to Storyblok. The cost of deployment was relatively low and it has more content editing features. The customer support team members are always online 24/7/367 and they offer the best training of working with …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
It offers an intuitive user experience, modern, versatile and consistent in performance. It simplifies the whole process of managing the digital experience across all marketing channels, which is done from a unified interface. This tool has enabled us to take control of our …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
OpenText went through an RFP process against IBM Content Management back in 2012. OpenText not only met our business and technical requirements, but we asked both vendors to show a use case and OpenText provided an extensive solution that IBM could not. Also the content …
Chose OpenText Web CMS
Elasticsearch is scalable, ready for cloud deployments, and documentation is readily available and comprehensive.

Our using HP Autonomy is based on the sunk cost fallacy.
Features
InterfyOpenText Web CMS
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Interfy
-
Ratings
OpenText Web CMS
8.6
Ratings
5% above category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Interfy
-
Ratings
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
Ratings
2% above category average
API00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Interfy
-
Ratings
OpenText Web CMS
8.0
Ratings
2% above category average
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Library of website themes00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Publishing workflow00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Form generator00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Interfy
-
Ratings
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
Ratings
5% above category average
Content taxonomy00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
InterfyOpenText Web CMS
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
InterfyOpenText Web CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
3.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
InterfyOpenText Web CMS
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Offering compelling experiences to customers, which help in improving satisfaction
  • Information is delivered across multiple channels
  • Testing relevant result sets to improve the rate of website conversion
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • I have recommendation for improvements.
  • It is easy to work with all the features.
  • All necessary content management tools are included.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
  • Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
  • We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
  • We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.
Read full review
ScreenShots