isoTracker QMS vs. OpenText ALM/Quality Center
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
isoTracker QMS | N/A | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | isoTracker QMS is a cloud-based quality management platform. Specializing in compliance to ISO 9001 and other similar standards. It is structured on a modular basis so installations can be module specific or for the entire system. It is ideal for small to medium sized businesses as it is affordably priced with free implementation and free training. Customer base is primarily in the USA and United Kingdom. The Document Control module has been validated for compliance to FDA 21 CFR Part 11… | $950 per year per installation |
OpenText ALM/Quality Center | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | OpenText™ ALM/Quality Center, formerly from Micro Focus, serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps users to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes. | N/A |
| isoTracker QMS | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Pricing is based on the number of users and the number of modules. It includes free training, free support and free upgrades. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| isoTracker QMS | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Would buy again 5 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Delivers good value for the price 4 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| isoTracker QMS | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Polarion ALM Score10 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | PTC Windchill RV&S Score2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management Score5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| isoTracker QMS | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 7.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 3.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.4 |
| Ease of integration | - | 1.0 |
| isoTracker QMS | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | isoTracker QMS Screenshots |








