Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Ivanti Patch is easy to deploy and use for any windows patch management and auto scan. Configuration management is very great with Ivanti Patch. They have a great support community and provide you with the best help and technical support from the Ivanti Patch support team. Ivanti Patch and system center configuration manager give you the best tools and features to their users for security and configuration management.

Anything Infrastructure is the best case scenario for Ansible use cases. The agentless feature of Ansible is one of its best selling points as it allows core Ansible to be supported on nearly any platform via any interface. AAP is a great solution for company's doing adhoc automation. It essentially brings the wild-west into the modern age by providing enterprise-grade capabilities such as API, scheduling, secure vault, centralized logging, RBAC, inventories, and more!

Incentivized

• Scheduling patching
• Inventory management
• Reporting
• Patch management

• Easy to read sets of instructions to do various things in and out of a pipeline.
• Templating
• Cloud and on prem provisioning.
• Scalability and reusability.
• We use it for everything from provisioning hardware for deploying software to it to running pipelines and building containers, etc. It's readable, easy to scale, and great for creating re-usable templates, scripts, or instructions.

Incentivized

• Ivanti Patch needs more enhancement for application connectors.
• Its user interface is not so easy to use for someone new.
• They can do some more improvement with auto scan and inventory management.

• Ansible is still not truly declarative like Terraform.
• Simple automation is fine, but creating complex, scalable automation scripts is very difficult to learn.
• For a higher number of nodes, Ansible consumes a lot of resources. It needs the paid version of AAP, which requires a cost.

Incentivized

We are extremely happy with the use of AAP. It's better than expected, There is almost no limit when thinking of automation. The only problem is that the day to day is consuming a big part of our time. Patching and checking vulnerabilities are virtually killing us. But we can only improve with AAP.

Incentivized

Overall, the product is excellent, with daily-use features for both large and small infrastructure. Ansible does its job quickly and ensures compliance, keeping the environment up to date and safe from open vulnerabilities. Large-scale inventory management and license management. Industry standard followed by best practices to maintain continuity. Budget-friendly compared to other products.

Incentivized

Great in almost every way compared to any other configuration management software. The only thing I wish for is python3 support. Other than that, YAML is much improved compared to the Ruby of Chef. The agentless nature is incredibly convenient for managing systems quickly, and if a member of your term has no terminal experience whatsoever they can still use the UI.

Incentivized

There is a lot of good documentation that Ansible and Red Hat provide which should help get someone started with making Ansible useful. But once you get to more complicated scenarios, you will benefit from learning from others. I have not used Red Hat support for work with Ansible, but many of the online resources are helpful.

Incentivized

I spoke on this topic today!

Incentivized

Ivanti Patch is more reliable and easy to use than any system center configuration management software in the market. This is value for money and provides you the best tools for patching and configuration. Its user interface is easy to understand and has a great support community online and Ivanti Patch's technical support team helps you in every step when they find any issues.

AAP compares favorably with Terraform and Power Automate. I don't have much experience with Terraform, but I find AAP and Ansible easier to use as well as having more capabilities. Power Platform is also an excellent automation tool that is user friendly but I feel that Ansible has more compatibility with a variety of technologies.

Incentivized

• Has saved me probably days of patching at this point
• Has kept our devices up to date, saved us from zero day attacks

• First, it keeps our entire server infrastructure aligned with our standards and reduces the time and effort needed to maintain our systems.
• Automate routine IT tasks to save time, reduce errors, and ensure every server is configured and updated consistently.
• Tasks that used to take our teams weeks to complete manually now run automatically and reliably, with full visibility, making our infrastructure management more effective and our compliance tracking much easier.

Incentivized