Ivanti Security Controls vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ivanti Security Controls
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Ivanti Security Controls is a vulnerability management solution, which replaces the former Heat Unified Endpoint Management & Security product, which in turn was formerly a Lumension supported product.N/A
Ansible
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it.
$5,000
per year
Pricing
Ivanti Security ControlsRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic Tower
5,000
per year
Enterprise Tower
10,000
per year
Premium Tower
14,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ivanti Security ControlsAnsible
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ivanti Security ControlsRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Ivanti Security ControlsRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Small Businesses
Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection
Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
HashiCorp Vagrant
HashiCorp Vagrant
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Automox
Automox
Score 9.2 out of 10
Microsoft System Center
Microsoft System Center
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Automox
Automox
Score 9.2 out of 10
SUSE Manager
SUSE Manager
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Ivanti Security ControlsRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(3 ratings)
8.8
(56 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(10 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(2 ratings)
7.3
(5 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
Ivanti Security ControlsRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Ivanti
Agentless patching is the best of all the products I've used. The real-time updates that don't require re-scanning after each step is great.
Read full review
Red Hat
For IT shops that do not have much developer experience and/or need to have a robust service catalog, AAP is pretty weak. The hybrid cloud story is muddy at best and could stand to have a CI/CD pipeline-like tool that allows non-developers to create complex workflows using smaller low-code piece parts.
Read full review
Pros
Ivanti
  • Trusted ownership checking is a good way to implement effective basic protection.
  • Patching is important today to react quickly to security problems. With Security Controls, it's easier than ever before.
  • One console for whole security.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Agentless. For our implementation, this is the single biggest factor. If we have to touch the machine and install an agent before we can start managing it, that's already too much effort and slows us down.
  • Re-entrant. This is not unique to Ansible, but certainly a huge improvement over custom scripts and such. Because it's such a huge effort to make scripts re-entrant, most of our scripts did not allow an elegant way to recover on failure. Manually cleaning up the half-attempt and re-trying is still too cumbersome, and being able to just re-run Ansible is a great improvement!
  • Infrastructure as code. This is new to Ansible, and there are still a few minor bugs with their AWS modules, but it's been a huge help being able to define our infrastructure in an Ansible playbook, commit it to source control, and use one tool for all our DevOps tasks.
Read full review
Cons
Ivanti
  • Performance of the console when using agentless machines.
  • The console layout is a bit cumbersome - would be better if all functions were accessible from one screen.
  • Common deployment examples to assist with deployment types.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Ansible Tower is a paid service, which can be annoying at times. But that is understandable, as it requires an additional level of support from the Ansible team to develop.
  • There is a decently large learning curve for someone not familiar with setting up Unix environments. However, there is a very large support community with tons of documentation, so it's not a dealbreaker.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Ivanti
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
We are deploying Ansible at all levels of the organization
Read full review
Usability
Ivanti
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
the yaml is easy to write and most people can be taught to write basic playbooks in a few weeks
Read full review
Performance
Ivanti
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Ansible is very friendly to start with. With just a few configurations, you have full management to your servers. You can configure it and implement it in seconds. You can also set up a cron job to make sure it gets implemented. It suits our need perfectly. Support can be a bit hard.
Read full review
Support Rating
Ivanti
Support wasn't used as the cost didn't justify the expense. We have yet to use the support.
Read full review
Red Hat
There is a lot of good documentation that Ansible and Red Hat provide which should help get someone started with making Ansible useful. But once you get to more complicated scenarios, you will benefit from learning from others. I have not used Red Hat support for work with Ansible, but many of the online resources are helpful.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Ivanti
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
I spoke on this topic today!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Ivanti
Since we have been using Application Control for about 15 years, it is, of course, the best solution for us. We also looked at other products (RES One Workspace), but they didn't convince us. Some features of RES were good and are now part of the User Workspace Manager. The Microsoft solution seems too complicated to us and does not have the advantages of Trusted Ownership Checking.
Read full review
Red Hat
Ansible is much easier than Puppet, more enterprises are switching from Puppet to Ansible due to ease of use. Ansible has integration modules which allow you to transition from Puppet or Chef to Ansible. IT Automation space has a CAGR of 200%+ what are you doing to not get left behind?
Read full review
Return on Investment
Ivanti
  • Reduced amount of operating hours for administration of patching.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Ansible has definitely helped our security team keep our servers up to date on the latest vulnerabilities through their continuous team of patch deployments.
  • The time to market for our code deployments have sped up 3 fold at least and is expected to continue improving as more teams are comfortable with DevOps framework.
  • Ansible is open source and free, which is great. But for an enterprise deployment, we had to budget for extra nodes as Tower only comes with licenses for 10.
Read full review
ScreenShots