Izenda vs. Wolfram Mathematica

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Izenda
Score 10.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Izenda is a business intelligence software offering from Izenda.N/A
Mathematica
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Wolfram's flagship product Mathematica is a modern technical computing application featuring a flexible symbolic coding language and a wide array of graphing and data visualization capabilities.
$1,520
per year
Pricing
IzendaWolfram Mathematica
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard Cloud
$1,520
per year
Standard Desktop
$3,040
one-time fee
Standard Desktop & Cloud
$3,344
one-time fee
Mathematica Enterprise Edition
$8,150.00
one-time fee
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IzendaMathematica
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsNo per user or core fees, unlimited use licensing for production and non-production instances.Discounts available for students and educational institutions. The Network Edition reduce per-user license costs through shared deployment across any number of machines on a local-area network.
More Pricing Information
Features
IzendaWolfram Mathematica
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Izenda
9.3
2 Ratings
14% above category average
Wolfram Mathematica
9.9
6 Ratings
17% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports9.02 Ratings9.84 Ratings
Customizable dashboards10.02 Ratings9.94 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates9.02 Ratings9.96 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Izenda
9.3
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Wolfram Mathematica
9.9
9 Ratings
19% above category average
Drill-down analysis9.02 Ratings9.98 Ratings
Formatting capabilities10.02 Ratings9.98 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.02 Ratings9.99 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings9.97 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Izenda
8.8
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Wolfram Mathematica
9.3
8 Ratings
10% above category average
Publish to Web9.02 Ratings9.97 Ratings
Publish to PDF9.02 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Report Versioning9.02 Ratings9.97 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.02 Ratings8.95 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings8.95 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Izenda
9.0
2 Ratings
11% above category average
Wolfram Mathematica
9.9
9 Ratings
18% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)10.02 Ratings9.99 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization8.02 Ratings9.98 Ratings
Predictive Analytics9.02 Ratings9.98 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Izenda
9.0
2 Ratings
5% above category average
Wolfram Mathematica
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Izenda
10.0
2 Ratings
23% above category average
Wolfram Mathematica
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IzendaWolfram Mathematica
Small Businesses
Cyfe
Cyfe
Score 8.8 out of 10
Cyfe
Cyfe
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
TIBCO Jaspersoft Community Edition
TIBCO Jaspersoft Community Edition
Score 9.7 out of 10
Entrinsik Informer
Entrinsik Informer
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
TIBCO Jaspersoft Community Edition
TIBCO Jaspersoft Community Edition
Score 9.7 out of 10
IBM Analytics Engine
IBM Analytics Engine
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IzendaWolfram Mathematica
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
9.9
(9 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
IzendaWolfram Mathematica
Likelihood to Recommend
Izenda
With Izenda, we can offer our trusted users dashboards, generated custom reports, and ad-hoc reporting, right within our own operation. Integrating the Izenda tool directly into our usage meant that we were suitable to use a small corridor of Izenda as core functionality while reserving the more advanced sections of Izenda for guests willing to pay redundancy for the licensing.
Read full review
Wolfram
We are the judgement that Wolfram Mathematica is despite many critics based on the paradigms selected a mark in the fields of the markets for computations of all kind. Wolfram Mathematica is even a choice in fields where other bolide systems reign most of the market. Wolfram Mathematica offers rich flexibility and internally standardizes the right methodologies for his user community. Wolfram Mathematica is not cheap and in need of a hard an long learner journey. That makes it weak in comparison with of-the-shelf-solution packages or even other programming languages. But for systematization of methods Wolfram Mathematica is far in front of almost all the other. Scientist and interested people are able to develop themself further and Wolfram Matheamatica users are a human variant for themself. The reach out for modern mathematics based science is deep and a unique unified framework makes the whole field of mathematics accessable comparable to the brain of Albert Einstein. The paradigms incorporated are the most efficients and consist in assembly on the market. The mathematics is covering and fullfills not just education requirements but the demands and needs of experts.
Mathematica is incompatible with other systems for mCAx and therefore the borders between the systems are hard to overcome. Wolfram Mathematica should be consider one of the more open systems because other code can be imported and run but on the export side it is rathe incompatible by design purposes. A better standard for all that might solve the crisis but there is none in sight. Selection of knowledge of what works will be in the future even more focussed and general system might be one the lossy side. Knowledge of esthetics of what will be in the highest demand in necessary and Wolfram is not a leader in this field of science. Mathematics leves from gathering problems from application fields and less from the glory of itself and the formalization of this.
Read full review
Pros
Izenda
  • User and tenant management is excellent. It is very simple to implement and easy to manage.
  • The configurability and customizability are excellent. We have access to all aspects of the system and have rebranded and configured single sign on. The users really like it.
  • Reports and visualizations work. There's lots of flexibility and users enjoy creating reports themselves.
Read full review
Wolfram
  • It allows straightforward integration of analytic analysis of algebraic expressions and their numerical implemented.
  • Supports varying programmatic paradigms, so one can choose what best fits the problem or task: pure functions, procedural programming, list processing, and even (with a bit of setup) object-oriented programming.
  • The extensive and rich tools for graphical rendering make it very easy to not just get 2D and 3D renderings of final output, but also to do quick-and-dirty 2D and 3D rendering of intermediate results and/or debugging results.
Read full review
Cons
Izenda
  • It would be superb if power users were ready to input a SQL statement to create a knowledge set.
  • The data source selection view while creating a replacement report.
Read full review
Wolfram
  • Should include more libraries and functions.
  • Should include more functions that can be used in Machine Learning.
  • Should include more functions that can be used in Data Science.
Read full review
Usability
Izenda
With the help of Izenda, we are able to build a mature foundation that users can quickly customize to their needs. Once permissions are layered in, we can simply use the same report and only show fields a specific user has access to.
Read full review
Wolfram
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Izenda
Izenda always provides great support to their users.
Read full review
Wolfram
Wolfram Mathematica is a nice software package. It has very nice features and easy to install and use in your machine. Besides this, there is a nice support from Wolfram. They come to the university frequently to give seminars in Mathematica. I think this is the best thing they are doing. That is very helpful for graduate and undergraduate students who are using Mathematica in their research.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Izenda
We compared to other end user tools like Qlik, Tableau and Power BI. These tools are very refined but not positioned for OEM/Embedded use cases. The closest we came was logi and Birst and the price and business model of Izenda was much more appealing
Read full review
Wolfram
We have evaluated and are using in some cases the Python language in concert with the Jupyter notebook interface. For UI, we using libraries like React to create visually stunning visualizations of such models. Mathematica compares favorably to this alternative in terms of speed of development. Mathematica compares unfavorably to this alternative in terms of license costs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Izenda
  • One of the best user interfaces.
  • Even a non-tech person can use it.
Read full review
Wolfram
  • Easy to solve huge mathematical equations, so it saved time there
  • Doing analysis and plotting graphs is also another plus point
  • Learning is very slow, and it took lot of time to learn its scripting language
Read full review
ScreenShots

Izenda Screenshots

Screenshot of Example of white label integration that inherits an application's look and feel.Screenshot of Report Designer with data field query capabilities.Screenshot of Visualizations on a dashboard.Screenshot of Another example of a modern dashboard.