TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Jedox

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AJedox is a Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management solution. According to the vendor, their solution’s unified planning, analysis and reporting empowers decision makers from finance, sales, purchasing and marketing. Additionally, the vendor says this solution helps business users work smarter, streamline business collaboration, and make insight-based decisions with confidence. The vendor also says 1,900 organizations in 127 countries are using Jedox for real-time planning…N/A

    RabbitMQ

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/ARabbitMQ, an open source message broker, is part of Pivotal Software, a VMware company acquired in 2019, and supports message queue, multiple messaging protocols, and more. RabbitMQ is available open source, however VMware also offers a range of commercial services for RabbitMQ; these are available as part of the Pivotal App Suite.N/A
    Pricing
    JedoxRabbitMQ
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    JedoxRabbitMQ
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    JedoxRabbitMQ
    Considered Both Products
    Jedox AG
    No answer on this topic
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Would buy again
    10 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    11 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    Features
    JedoxRabbitMQ
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Jedox and RabbitMQ
    Feature
    Jedox
    9.1
    4 Ratings
    19% above category average
    RabbitMQ
    -
    Ratings
    Pixel Perfect reports9.14 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards9.14 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates9.14 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Jedox and RabbitMQ
    Feature
    Jedox
    8.3
    3 Ratings
    7% above category average
    RabbitMQ
    -
    Ratings
    Drill-down analysis8.23 Ratings00 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities8.23 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Jedox and RabbitMQ
    Feature
    Jedox
    7.9
    3 Ratings
    0% below category average
    RabbitMQ
    -
    Ratings
    Publish to Web8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Publish to PDF7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Versioning7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling8.23 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Jedox and RabbitMQ
    Feature
    Jedox
    5.6
    3 Ratings
    27% below category average
    RabbitMQ
    -
    Ratings
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)5.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization5.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics5.63 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Jedox and RabbitMQ
    Feature
    Jedox
    8.8
    3 Ratings
    5% above category average
    RabbitMQ
    -
    Ratings
    Multi-User Support (named login)8.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model8.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Jedox and RabbitMQ
    Feature
    Jedox
    7.4
    3 Ratings
    0% above category average
    RabbitMQ
    -
    Ratings
    Responsive Design for Web Access8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Application7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
    Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Jedox and RabbitMQ
    Feature
    Jedox
    8.4
    4 Ratings
    4% above category average
    RabbitMQ
    -
    Ratings
    Long-term financial planning7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Financial budgeting9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Forecasting9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scenario modeling7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management reporting10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Consolidation and Close
    Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Jedox and RabbitMQ
    Feature
    Jedox
    9.5
    3 Ratings
    20% above category average
    RabbitMQ
    -
    Ratings
    Financial data consolidation10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journal entries and reports7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-currency management10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Intercompany Eliminations10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Local and consolidated reporting10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Detailed Audit Trails10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Financial Reporting and Compliance
    Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Jedox and RabbitMQ
    Feature
    Jedox
    9.3
    4 Ratings
    13% above category average
    RabbitMQ
    -
    Ratings
    Financial Statement Reporting9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management Reporting9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Excel-based Reporting10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated board and financial reporting9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Jedox and RabbitMQ
    Feature
    Jedox
    9.7
    4 Ratings
    25% above category average
    RabbitMQ
    -
    Ratings
    Personalized dashboards9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    KPIs9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost and profitability analysis10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration
    Comparison of Integration features of Jedox and RabbitMQ
    Feature
    Jedox
    9.0
    4 Ratings
    11% above category average
    RabbitMQ
    -
    Ratings
    Flat file integration9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Excel data integration9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Direct links to 3rd-party data sources9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    JedoxRabbitMQ
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Planning Analytics
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Apache Kafka
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
    Score7.2 out of 10
    Apache Kafka
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    JedoxRabbitMQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (8 ratings)
    9.9
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    6.5
    (4 ratings)
    Online Training
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    6.7
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sources
    8.9
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    4.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    JedoxRabbitMQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Jedox AG
    Best suited for financial consolidation and / or as a highly customized and compact EPM / BI solution (up to 100 CCU) with individual workflows, planning and reporting functionalities, with moderate number of users (no restrictions for any industry, all industries are covered well). It also has advanced reporting & data analysis requirements and provides an integration and reporting layer of imported data from different external systems (via ETL). It can help with migrating your legacy Excel-based business models to the Web. It is not well suited for Enterprise BI applications with expecting >500 CCU (users at the same time working with the system) - this may cause serious performance issues, as all data is kept in RAM. Jedox is also less suited for applications with heavy document management requirements (document management is not an out of the box functionality in Jedox and rather requires custom development through custom widgets etc.).
    Read full review
    Open Source
    It is highly recommended that if you have microservices architecture and if you want to solve 2 phase commit issue, you should use RabbitMQ for communication between microservices. It is a quick and reliable mode of communication between microservices. It is also helpful if you want to implement a job and worker mechanism. You can push the jobs into RabbitMQ and that will be sent to the consumer. It is highly reliable so you won't miss any jobs and you can also implement a retry of jobs with the dead letter queue feature. It will be also helpful in time-consuming API. You can put time-consuming items into a queue so they will be processed later and your API will be quick.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Jedox AG
    • Using the Excel add-in means that our team was almost instantly productive, being able to use a familiar interface to present and manipulate data.
    • Allows us to quickly do analysis and comparison of current and historic data.
    • Really good to produce meaningful management reporting that can be adapted responsively to business requirements.
    • Implementing Jedox in our budget cycle dramatically reduced the time and complexity of the process, while making it more transparent.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • What RabbitMQ does well is what it's advertised to do. It is good at providing lots of high volume, high availability queue. We've seen it handle upwards of 10 million messages in its queues, spread out over 200 queues before its publish/consume rates dipped. So yeah, it can definitely handle a lot of messages and a lot of queues. Depending on the size of the machine RabbitMQ is running on, I'm sure it can handle more.
    • Decent number of plugins! Want a plugin that gives you an interface to view all the queues and see their publish/consume rates? Yes, there's one for that. Want a plugin to "shovel" messages from one queue to another in an emergency? Check. Want a plugin that does extra logging for all the messages received? Got you covered!
    • Lots of configuration possibilities. We've tuned over 100 settings over the past year to get the performance and reliability just right. This could be a downside though--it's pretty confusing and some settings were hard to understand.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Jedox AG
    • Diversity. Jedox can be applied to many different use cases from small to large deployments and from budgeting to enterprise class BI solutions. But rarely is one tool able to fulfill all of these requirements in one organisation. This value proposition can be complicated for prospective users.
    • Awareness. Jedox punches above its weight in capability and scalability, but not enough people have heard about it and therefore procurement processes can be drawn out as a result.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • It breaks communication if we don't acknowledge early. In some cases our work items are time consuming that will take a time and in that scenario we are getting errors that RabbitMQ broke the channel. It will be good if RabbitMQ provides two acknowledgements, one is for that it has been received at client side and second ack is client is completed the processing part.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Jedox AG
    For a period of 5 years all our customers using Jedox have renewed their licenses.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Jedox AG
    To me Jedox deserves 10/10 because it is a consistent one-in-all platform with a modern look and feel. It is intuitive to use and allows you to make intuitive applications integrating traditional business intelligence with performance management functionality. It certainly has a short
    learning curve, especially for those that are familiar with MS Excel. An example: I've lost count but Jedox it is available in more than 25 languages. Another: Jedox does not require programming skills... it is developed to be used by the business.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    RabbitMQ is very easy to configure for all supported languages (Python, Java, etc.). I have personally used it on Raspberry Pi devices via a Flask Python API as well as in Java applications. I was able to learn it quickly and now have full mastery of it. I highly recommend it for any IoT project.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Jedox AG
    Jedox has
    very few bugs. Reports are available through an Excel add-in, the web and/or
    mobile device (IOS/Android). In my opinion, availability also means high
    performance, not having to wait for the system to give you the required reports,
    analysis, dashboards instantly.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Jedox AG
    Jedox is the fastest OLAP tool on the market. It can use GPU cards to increase performance even more
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Jedox AG
    Jedox support in general is a professional and fast responding team. An easy-to-use ticketing system is in place. Bug-related questions are solved fast (responses come usually in a few hours after the question), but some questions / tickets, that are not Jedox-related bugs (for example some advanced questions about Jedox functionality), may be forwarded to Application Management team for further processing and then it may take several days or even weeks to get a response here -> there is room for improvement here.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    I gave it a 10 but we do not have a support contract with any company for RabbitMQ so there is no official support in that regard. However, there is a community and questions asked on StackOverflow or any other major question and answer site will usually get a response.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Jedox AG
    The implementation of SSO, SAML Authentication, HTTPS, Server splitting (Frontend / Backend servers) could be more standardized and made more user friendly to set up (e.g. via setup guide). Otherwise the implementation of Jedox is quick and simple when compared to other similar technologies.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Jedox AG
    Calumo is similar product to Jedox. I have used it extensively in my previous role. It was a major contender when we evaluated a BI platform for NIDA. Calumo is a great product as well and it was a very close call. Where we found Jedox to be a better fit for NIDA was the ability to prepare dynamic reports with ease without the need to learn MDX which was used extensively by Calumo to make dynamic reports which expand or shrink based on the underlying data. Another major benefit we saw in Jedox was the whole ETL process could be managed within Jedox instead of doing it in SQL server which negates having a dedicated SQL specialist role when the scale expands.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    RabbitMQ has a few advantages over Azure Service Bus 1) RMQ handles substantially larger files - ASB tops out at 100MB, we use RabbitMQfor files over 200MB 2) RabbitMQ can be easily setup on prem - Azure Service Bus is cloud only 3) RabbitMQ exchanges are easier to configure over ASB subscriptions ASB has a few advantages too 1) Cloud based - just a few mouse clicks and you're up and running
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Jedox AG
    Scalability is often another word for speed. Given enough data, enough users or enough calculations, the tool becomes slower and slower. You will find that Jedox has a very high performance that can even be increased by the use of grafical cards. Other thaen that it does not only offer BI (looking back based on historical ERP data) but also allows you to look forward through integrated budgetting, planning, forecasting, workflow and collaboration. Not easy to find a tool that can support so much business functionality. So, also pretty scalable in that respect.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Jedox AG
    • Financial budgeting and Forecasting are done in a centralized fashion in Jedox now instead of a decentralized excel based approach. A lot of cost savings and improved reliability
    • Easy to use self-help Dashboards and detailed reports
    • Web-based reporting instead of excel based
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Positive: we don't need to keep way too many backend machines around to deal with bursts because RabbitMQ can absorb and buffer bursts long enough to let an understaffed set of backend services to catch up on processing. Hard to put a number to it but we probably save $5k a month having fewer machines around.
    • Negative: we've got many angry customers due to queues suddenly disappearing and dropping our messages when we try to publish to them afterward. Ideally, RabbitMQ should warn the user when queues expire due to inactivity but it doesn't, and due to our own bugs we've lost a lot of customer data as a result.
    • Positive: makes decoupling the web and API services from the deeper backend services easier by providing queues as an interface. This allowed us to split up our teams and have them develop independently of each other, speeding up software development.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Jedox Screenshots

    Screenshot of Management Dashboard with Google Maps WidgetScreenshot of ABC Analysis (Procurement)Screenshot of Executive Sales ReviewScreenshot of Finance DashboardScreenshot of Sales DashboardScreenshot of Start