TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    JMP Pro

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AJMP Pro offers all the capabilities of JMP, plus advanced features for more sophisticated analysis including predictive modeling and cross-validation techniques.N/A

    TensorFlow

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/ATensorFlow is an open-source machine learning software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. It was originally developed by Google.N/A
    Pricing
    JMP ProTensorFlow
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    JMP ProTensorFlow
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    JMP ProTensorFlow
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    SAS Enterprise Guide
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SAS Enterprise Guide
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    JMP ProTensorFlow
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    6.0
    (15 ratings)
    Usability
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    JMP ProTensorFlow
    Likelihood to Recommend
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    JMP Pro is perfectly suited for statistical analysis but users should have some statistical knowledge before using it since there may be some terms/functions in the software that are not widely used in other fields. No prior coding experience is needed to use JMP Pro. However, most people doing data processing would prefer to code their analysis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    TensorFlow is great for most deep learning purposes. This is especially true in two domains: 1. Computer vision: image classification, object detection and image generation via generative adversarial networks 2. Natural language processing: text classification and generation. The good community support often means that a lot of off-the-shelf models can be used to prove a concept or test an idea quickly. That, and Google's promotion of Colab means that ideas can be shared quite freely. Training, visualizing and debugging models is very easy in TensorFlow, compared to other platforms (especially the good old Caffe days). In terms of productionizing, it's a bit of a mixed bag. In our case, most of our feature building is performed via Apache Spark. This means having to convert Parquet (columnar optimized) files to a TensorFlow friendly format i.e., protobufs. The lack of good JVM bindings mean that our projects end up being a mix of Python and Scala. This makes it hard to reuse some of the tooling and support we wrote in Scala. This is where MXNet shines better (though its Scala API could do with more work).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    • Several types of segmentation models
    • Conjoint design
    • VERY user-friendly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • A vast library of functions for all kinds of tasks - Text, Images, Tabular, Video etc.
    • Amazing community helps developers obtain knowledge faster and get unblocked in this active development space.
    • Integration of high-level libraries like Keras and Estimators make it really simple for a beginner to get started with neural network based models.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    • JMP Pro is a really powerful tool for doing statistical analysis. Although the click environment does not require coding experience, new learners will still need to take a long time to know the parameters in the function before performing any analysis.
    • The output from JMP Pro analysis (regression analysis) is not always easy to understand, especially when the parameters are programmed differently with the other similar software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • RNNs are still a bit lacking, compared to Theano.
    • Cannot handle sequence inputs
    • Theano is perhaps a bit faster and eats up less memory than TensorFlow on a given GPU, perhaps due to element-wise ops. Tensorflow wins for multi-GPU and “compilation” time.
    Read full review
    Usability
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    JMP Pro is a great tool, but it's not user friendly. JMP Pro is something that requires a lot of trial and error to figure out. Minitab is far more user friendly and their help guides walk new users how to do everything. JMP Pro requires taking the time to do the STIPs course, or brute force figuring it out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Support of multiple components and ease of development.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    Community support for TensorFlow is great. There's a huge community that truly loves the platform and there are many examples of development in TensorFlow. Often, when a new good technique is published, there will be a TensorFlow implementation not long after. This makes it quick to ally the latest techniques from academia straight to production-grade systems. Tooling around TensorFlow is also good. TensorBoard has been such a useful tool, I can't imagine how hard it would be to debug a deep neural network gone wrong without TensorBoard.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    Use of cloud for better execution power is recommended.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    I use both JMP Pro and Minitab. JMP Pro works great for doing the work that needs live edit functionable, and the ability to filter charts on the go. Minitab is what I use for capability analysis and MSAs as the overall UI is much cleaner, and is far nicer to present to management than JMP Pro.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Keras is built on top of TensorFlow, but it is much simpler to use and more Python style friendly, so if you don't want to focus on too many details or control and not focus on some advanced features, Keras is one of the best options, but as far as if you want to dig into more, for sure TensorFlow is the right choice
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    JMP Statistical Discovery
    • None. It's cheaper than SPSS. You could probably get by with the basic JMP package.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Learning is s bit difficult takes lot of time.
    • Developing or implementing the whole neural network is time consuming with this, as you have to write everything.
    • Once you have learned this, it make your job very easy of getting the good result.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots