TrustRadius

jPDFWeb vs. Kami

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
jPDFWeb
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
jPDFWeb is a Java library to convert PDF documents to SVG / HTML5. The library can save to the local file system or to an output stream to be able to serve the document directly to a client browser when working within a J2EE server. jPDFWeb is built on top of Qoppa’s proprietary PDF technology so you do not have to install any third party software or drivers. Since it is written in Java, it allows your application to remain platform independent and run on Windows, Linux, Unix (Solaris,…N/A
Kami
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Kami is a document annotation tool that enables students stay engaged, and that helps teachers to save time with streamlined instruction and assessment. It includes tools to make PDFs and digital resources more engaging for everyone.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
jPDFWebKami
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Workplace Plan - Pro Plan
$10
per month per user
Workplace Plan - Work Plan
$20
per month per user
Teacher Plan
$99
per year per user
School or District Plan
Custom
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
jPDFWebKami
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—Discount for annual pricing on workplace plans.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
jPDFWebKami
Considered Both Products
jPDFWeb

No answer on this topic

Kami
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Kami
I think that Kami is easier to use and works in a more consistent way. Orbitnote is clunky and doesn't work as consistently. In the accessibility space, we are starting to recommend Kami products over the TextHelp/Everyway family of products. I think the Google integration is …
Chose Kami
I like Miro better for teacher directed lessons, and group discussions. I like Nearpod more if I have to include a number of different interactive aspects to lessons. I find Google Slides and Adobe to be more clunky and less user friendly than Kami generally.
However, if I want …
Features
jPDFWebKami
PDF Editors
Comparison of PDF Editors features of Product A and Product B
jPDFWeb
-
Ratings
Kami
8.2
Ratings
4% below category average
Edit Text and Images00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Merge or Split PDFs00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Add Annotations00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Text Recognition (OCR)00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Page Management00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Form Creation and Editing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Secure PDFs00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Convert to Different Formats00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Comment and Review Tools00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Undo and Redo Actions00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
jPDFWebKami
Small Businesses
Tungsten Power PDF
Tungsten Power PDF
Score 9.8 out of 10
Tungsten Power PDF
Tungsten Power PDF
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
pdfFiller
pdfFiller
Score 9.0 out of 10
pdfFiller
pdfFiller
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Bluebeam
Bluebeam
Score 9.0 out of 10
Bluebeam
Bluebeam
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
jPDFWebKami
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
jPDFWebKami
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Right now it is great for most classrooms in grades 3/4+. I would love an early elementary/simpler form for young grades and those with complex needs. The many options may not be ideal for younger students.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Kami does a great job at helping you reshape pdfs and share documents from different formats.
  • I like being able to give all of my students a copy of a document, and having Kami organize each student's work product in real-time.
  • I like being able to annotate directly on a student's work so that they can receive feedback in real-time.
  • I like being able to merge, cut, and edit documents quickly.
PH
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • When I am multitasking on multiple screens, there are times when I am trying to scroll with my stylus and I end up writing on the document.
  • When Kami creates folders and organization, there seems to be almost too much redundancy. The same file seems to be in multiple places. I don't know if that is a Kami problem or a me problem, but I'll probably start trying to clean things up a little soon.
  • I think that the tool restriction for students method could be improved.
PH
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Kami is easy to use and easy to find information that I am looking for. If I need to learn how to use a tool I can look up references easily. The tools are easy to deploy for both staff and students. I find that the icons are intuitive
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I like Miro better for teacher directed lessons, and group discussions. I like Nearpod more if I have to include a number of different interactive aspects to lessons. I find Google Slides and Adobe to be more clunky and less user friendly than Kami generally. However, if I want to just make a document better, or I want to give my students independent work, or if I want them to complete homework than Kami is my go-to tool
PH
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • My desk has about 10% of the paperwork sitting on it than it used to have.
  • I never have any arguments about whether a student turned something in or not.
  • A student doesn't have to physically see me for me to help them with work. I can write and they can see what I write.
  • Sharing documents with colleagues is now a breeze.
PH
Read full review
ScreenShots

jPDFWeb Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of