TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

HPE Juniper Access Points vs. Ruckus Wireless Access Points

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    HPE Juniper Access Points

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AThe Juniper AP Series Access Points work in conjunction with the Juniper Mist Cloud Architecture and Mist AI to collect and analyze metadata in near real-time from all wireless clients. This is to enable rapid problem detection and root cause identification with predictive recommendations and proactive correction realizing the self-driving network.N/A

    Ruckus Wireless Access Points

    Score4 out of 10
    N/ANow a CommScope company, Ruckus offers APs to fit just about any budget, performance requirement or deployment scenario, with APs designed to provide secure, reliable access no matter how tough the environment.

    $795

    one-time fee (approx)

    Pricing
    HPE Juniper Access PointsRuckus Wireless Access Points
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Ruckus H550 - wireless access point - Bluetooth, ZigBee, Wi-Fi 6
    $795.00
    one-time fee (approx)
    Ruckus R550 Series
    $860.00
    one-time fee (approx)
    Ruckus T350C - Unleashed - wireless access point - Wi-Fi 6
    $1,295.00
    one-time fee (approx)
    Ruckus R850 - wireless access point - Bluetooth, ZigBee, Wi-Fi 6
    $1,835.00
    one-time fee (approx)
    Ruckus R670 Wi-Fi 7 Tri-Band Wireless Access Point
    $1,995.00
    one-time fee (approx)
    Ruckus R760 - wireless access point - Bluetooth, ZigBee, Wi-Fi 6E
    $2,395.00
    one-time fee (approx)
    Ruckus R770 Wi-Fi 7 Tri-Band Concurrent Wireless Access Point
    $2,595.00
    one-time fee (approx)
    Ruckus T670 Wi-Fi Outdoor Access Point
    $3,095.00
    one-time fee (approx)
    Ruckus T750 - wireless access point - Wi-Fi 6
    $3,775.00
    one-time fee (approx)
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HPE Juniper Access PointsRuckus Wireless Access Points
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    HPE Juniper Access PointsRuckus Wireless Access Points
    Considered Both Products
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    Chose HPE Juniper Access Points
    I initially selected HPE Juniper Access Points on the recommendation of a vendor I trust. I previewed the Mist console and liked what I saw. On subsequent purchases, it was a no brainer to stick with them because it has worked out so well. My only concern is how much things …
    Incentivized
    Chose HPE Juniper Access Points
    Less down time and easier interface
    Incentivized
    CommScope
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    92%
    Would buy again
    11 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    11 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    11 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    82%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    HPE Juniper Access PointsRuckus Wireless Access Points
    Small Businesses
    WatchGuard Secure Wi-Fi Cloud
    Score9.1 out of 10
    WatchGuard Secure Wi-Fi Cloud
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Cisco Aironet 1800 Series Access Points (discontinued)
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Cisco Aironet 1800 Series Access Points (discontinued)
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points
    Score9.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    HPE Juniper Access PointsRuckus Wireless Access Points
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.3
    (12 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.4
    (12 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    HPE Juniper Access PointsRuckus Wireless Access Points
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    The Mist portal-controlled Juniper APs are great in an environment where clients are relatively stationary. Coverage is fantastic, and throughput is really good. I would be more concerned about placing these in a distribution-type warehouse where clients frequently roam between APs. While I've not had any issues, I could see where some APs might become sticky due to the cloud-controlled nature. In my experience, a local controller would be better suited to environments like that. I'm also concerned that support and quality may suffer due to the HPE merger.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CommScope
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Juniper AP45 coverage is great. We have one deployed in a sub-optimal manner (too high, too much space for a single AP), and we still have great coverage.
    • The APs are easy to configure via the Mist Portal. You can create sitewide templates, as well as templates for subsets of APs.
    • The APs are reliable. We don't have much trouble out of them. I can count on 1 hand how many times I've had to reboot one in the past year.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CommScope
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • I wish there was a mobile app that allows configuration and health status checks
    • The MIST UI could use some improvements - some things take more than 1 click to access
    • Marvis doesn't impress me. I ask it questions and sometimes it doesn't respond or understand
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CommScope
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    We used a reseller to help set up and initially manage the Juniper APs. Templates are set up and deployed to sites, and at first, it may seem complicated, with a slight learning curve. Once created and deployed, the overall management and usability are great. In summary, the initial setup takes some advanced knowledge of the Cloud Dashboard setup with templates. After that, it's easy to use and manage moving forward.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CommScope
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    I prefer Juniper. Configuring the extreme environment was odd and clunky. Three years after we deployed Extreme I got informed the virtual controller we were using was end of life. The APs were still good, just the controller was end of life. I had to deploy a new virtual controller and reconfigure everything. I won't have this problem with Mist's cloud controller
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CommScope
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Honestly, the best thing I can say is users had no idea we changed the network. We went from a network with little to no problems to a new network with no problems.
    • When we deployed the new Access Points, users just connected and went about their day.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CommScope
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots