Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Proofpoint Information Protection

This service may be useful for some businesses, so it's important to try it before deciding. It offers multiple layers of protection for both assisted and unassisted attacks, sandboxing (for obfuscated attacks), and a decent anti-phishing tool. It can be tricky to set up, but not the end of the world. In our case, unfortunately, the false positives were just unbearable.

Incentivized

Best suited for organizations that are dealing with high volumes of protected/personsal or financial information that must be kept secure

Incentivized

• Neural network based anti-phishing and anti-spam for multilayered security.
• Scalable resources according to business growth.
• Flexible to use in almost all devices.

Incentivized

• User administration is very intuitive and simple.
• Rules are quickly implemented allowing solid email incidence response.
• Enterprise support is spectacular offering to go above and beyond whenever necessary.

Incentivized

• False positives.
• Integration can be fiddly.

Incentivized

• Continue to improve on the receiving side when the message is delivered through the system

Incentivized

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is very easy to set up and has way fewer false positives than Kaspersky Security for Mail Server. It has virtually the same features as the Kaspersky alternative and it is extremely easy to set up. It feels like Microsoft Exchange Online Protection gives slightly more transparency about its conclusions, which allows users to make an informed decision about certain messages.

Incentivized

• Balance our manpower distribution in between security team and management team.
• Help to create secure work environment for all staff.
• Reduce our cost by proper utilization of security budget.

Incentivized

• Stronger security posture.
• Able to quickly respond to SPAM/Phishing campaigns.
• Business is more adaptive and agile in the security space.

Incentivized