Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Symantec mail security for Microsoft Exchange

This service may be useful for some businesses, so it's important to try it before deciding. It offers multiple layers of protection for both assisted and unassisted attacks, sandboxing (for obfuscated attacks), and a decent anti-phishing tool. It can be tricky to set up, but not the end of the world. In our case, unfortunately, the false positives were just unbearable.

Incentivized

Any business, regardless of size, can benefit from using Symantec Mail Security. It's very well customizable, easy to use and set up, and easy to maintain. It's a great tool to avoid unsolicited messages, security issues, phishing attacks, viruses, etc. It's really reassuring that the software is kept up-to-date, so we can be sure to be protected should a new kind of attack emerge.

Incentivized

• Neural network based anti-phishing and anti-spam for multilayered security.
• Scalable resources according to business growth.
• Flexible to use in almost all devices.

Incentivized

• False positives.
• Integration can be fiddly.

Incentivized

Microsoft Exchange Online Protection is very easy to set up and has way fewer false positives than Kaspersky Security for Mail Server. It has virtually the same features as the Kaspersky alternative and it is extremely easy to set up. It feels like Microsoft Exchange Online Protection gives slightly more transparency about its conclusions, which allows users to make an informed decision about certain messages.

Incentivized

• Balance our manpower distribution in between security team and management team.
• Help to create secure work environment for all staff.
• Reduce our cost by proper utilization of security budget.

Incentivized