Keyword Eye vs. Rank Ranger

Great for the ability it provides in peeking into search volumes, but the information is limited. The platform could benefit from some of the features of Uber Suggest and Answer the Public.

Incentivized

It is great for just tracking keyword performance. The other features are nice but are not the most useful when compared to other for robust tools. The easy-on-the-eyes interface and the fact that keyword data can be updated in less than 3 hours after a bulk upload are why this tool works for lower-maintenance websites.

Incentivized

• Various keyword search volume organization options.
• The ability to save keyword searches.

Incentivized

• Pricing
• customer service

• Integration with other platforms.
• Keyword search optimization options.

Incentivized

• Domain metrics
• Backlink Analysis

Incentivized

No experience in needing support from Keyword Eye.

Incentivized

While both are billed as keyword performance tools. Conductor is a much more robust tool and not totally necessary for lower-maintenance websites. Rank Ranger is perfect for our clients that simply need keyword tracking and reporting on a monthly basis whereas we utilize Conductor for in-depth content recommendations, on-page and competitor analyses.

Incentivized

• Improved ability to create better targeted content.
• Cross analysis of keyword volumes and website analytics.

Incentivized

• It isn't as expensive as some alternatives
• We feel we have lost market share by not using Ahrefs or Semrush
• The graphs are hard to decipher at times making the data less useful