Keyword Eye vs. seoClarity

Great for the ability it provides in peeking into search volumes, but the information is limited. The platform could benefit from some of the features of Uber Suggest and Answer the Public.

Incentivized

Well suited for large sites with many pages and a large pool of relevant keywords. For online businesses with less than a couple thousand keywords driving significant volume and revenue it's almost certainly overkill.

Incentivized

• Various keyword search volume organization options.
• The ability to save keyword searches.

Incentivized

• Daily organic rank tracking across desktop and mobile, capturing details for top 100 results each keyword
• CSV import and export
• Custom enterprise solutions for large scale SEO teams
• Account management via live chat, email, phone and in person educational events
• Page level and keyword level grouping and aggregation

Incentivized

• Integration with other platforms.
• Keyword search optimization options.

Incentivized

• The interface, while providing very rich and granular information, is a bit clunky compared to other solutions.
• Non-core functionality like content suggestions and site crawlers are just not as strong as dedicated solutions
• Adding or removing keywords periodically will skew your charts in some views and makes analysis a bit challenging.

Incentivized

No experience in needing support from Keyword Eye.

Incentivized

All solutions in this category tend to be more similar than different. Competitors tend to be larger organizations, have a bit more polish to the interface but also are a bit more obtuse when it comes to pricing.

Incentivized

• Improved ability to create better targeted content.
• Cross analysis of keyword volumes and website analytics.

Incentivized

• Helpful in tracking efforts
• Helpful in monitoring and reacting to algorithm updates
• Helpful in gathering competitive insight at a large scale

Incentivized