Layer2 Cloud Connector vs. Qlik Replicate

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Layer2 Cloud Connector
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
The Layer2 Cloud Connector can integrate data and sync documents between 100+ corporate data sources without programming. It is used to connect services and apps on-premises or cloud-based, such as Microsoft Office 365, SharePoint, Dynamics, Azure, SQL/ERP/CRM, and more for migration, backup, or permanent two-way synchronization.
$491
per installation
Qlik Replicate
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Qlik Replicate enables organizations to accelerate data real-time replication, ingestion and streaming via change data capture, across a wide range of heterogeneous databases, data warehouses and data lake platforms.N/A
Pricing
Layer2 Cloud ConnectorQlik Replicate
Editions & Modules
Personal Edition
$491.00
per installation
Professional Edition
$1226.00
per installation
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Layer2 Cloud ConnectorQlik Replicate
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup Fee$185 Setup SupportRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Layer2 Cloud ConnectorQlik Replicate
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Layer2 Cloud ConnectorQlik Replicate
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
Layer2 Cloud Connector
6.0
1 Ratings
32% below category average
Qlik Replicate
-
Ratings
Connect to traditional data sources6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
Layer2 Cloud Connector
5.5
1 Ratings
41% below category average
Qlik Replicate
-
Ratings
Simple transformations4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Complex transformations7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
Layer2 Cloud Connector
6.5
1 Ratings
23% below category average
Qlik Replicate
-
Ratings
Integration with data quality tools6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Layer2 Cloud ConnectorQlik Replicate
Small Businesses
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 9.7 out of 10
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.1 out of 10
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.1 out of 10
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Layer2 Cloud ConnectorQlik Replicate
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.5
(35 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(32 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Layer2 Cloud ConnectorQlik Replicate
Likelihood to Recommend
Layer 2 GmbH
We had a scenario where our clients have thousands of external party vendors/committees who regularly sync SharePoint data. Managing thousands of external parties can never be possible without using a Layer2 cloud connector. We managed the local network sharing and SharePoint integration by using the Layer2 connector. Layer2 is convenient with a large amount of data as the per-user license is high.
Read full review
Qlik
Qlik Replicate works very well with relational data platforms, both on premise and in the cloud, for example Oracle, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL and others, it also works very well with DB2. If the data source is MongoDB, it is more complicated and currently there is no possibility of sending data to MongoDB.
Read full review
Pros
Layer 2 GmbH
  • Layer2 provides best connectivity with SharePoint
  • It syncs local network shared files to the SharePoint
  • Provides details file history
Read full review
Qlik
  • Replicate is extremely stable and does not generate a lot of alerts/failures/issues that take up time to troubleshoot.
  • It is very easy to add new source tables to a Replicate task so that we're always in sync with new data available from the CRM.
  • It's nice that Qlik Replicate also allows you to create a job to stop and then restart your tasks during maintenance windows that occur on both the source and target systems.
Read full review
Cons
Layer 2 GmbH
  • Per User cost is expensive
  • A lot of pre-requisites
  • UI needs to be more user-friendly
Read full review
Qlik
  • The base Replicate web GUI is lacking. If you have dozens or more tasks, it's hard to get a sense of how they're performing. Enterprise Manager solves all of these problems but is a separate install.
  • The support portal is extremely difficult to navigate. It's hard to track down exactly what you're looking for.
  • It would be helpful to have better documentation and example queries for the tables in the Enterprise Manager analytics database.
  • Destination databases that don't support common DDL commands behave unpredictably. And the replication of schema changes isn't consistent.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Layer 2 GmbH
No answers on this topic
Qlik
The availability of the replicated data in disparate environments has is now crucial. Replacing a product like Qlik Replicate would require significant time, investments, and work. In addition, Qlik Replicate is reasonably reliable with few failures.
Read full review
Usability
Layer 2 GmbH
No answers on this topic
Qlik
We now have greater business flexibility and scalability, and our big data integration projects have a quick rate of growth, which has been profitable for us. Independent of the sources involved, maintaining data consistency between sources is easy. One of my favorite features is the way it lets owners of the source system start and stop processes from updating their system windows.
Read full review
Support Rating
Layer 2 GmbH
No answers on this topic
Qlik
The issue I've had is that Qlik does an awful job of keeping their customers informed when new versions of the software are available. We found that we were using a version that was no longer supported and could never get help. When it came time to get us upgraded so that we were on a current version, no one knew how to help get us to where we needed to be. We had to purchased professional services time and even then I was basically on my own to get everything built out and set up. Qlik needs to be more proactive with communicating about new releases and how to get your version upgraded in the most secure, safe way possible.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Layer 2 GmbH
No answers on this topic
Qlik
Follow the directions from the Qlik documentation. They are pretty straight forward and easy enough to follow. If you follow these, then you are not likely to have issues on implementation.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Layer 2 GmbH
We had also used Microsoft One Drive as a syncing tool but it requires Office365 for managing and syncing data across thousands of vendors which was not practically possible to manage users on Office 365. Layer2 resolved this issue by having 3 user licenses and they are enough to periodically sync all external parties' data with our SharePoint online.
Read full review
Qlik
Great tool for data replication solution for Oracle/SQLServers/etc. Real easy to get it set up and start realizing business value. Getting the PoC accomplished in a short window. Product costing and easy to start small and scale as needed. It helped cover most of our ask compared to other solutions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Layer 2 GmbH
  • Layer2 resolves the time management issue
  • Resolved data syncing issues across different external vendors
  • LOE optimisation with using Layer2 connector.
Read full review
Qlik
  • Prior to using Qlik Replicate, we used an ETL solution to copy data from the Oracle ERP system to the Microsoft SQL Server BI system at a 15-minute interval. It was very tedious to maintain. Qlik Replicate is much easier to use and we replicate data near real-time now.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Qlik Replicate Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of