2 Reviews and Ratings
10 Reviews and Ratings
No answers on this topic
In our experience, the product performs really well when interfacing systems with ERP's through SQL server database tables, but we've even made some interfaces with the web service functionality included with the magic xpi integration platform. Also, we've made some SAP Business One - SAP Business One interfaces, for copying information from one company to another and even between two different ERP systems.Incentivized
It fits perfectly for SOA and EAI architecture with large numbers of services that required to be wired to each other, the binding virtualization is quite good to simply this part. For the simple scenario of orchestration and /or ESB architecture could be a better use traditional stack.Incentivized
The UI is really simple to use, you have source/destination mapping for the items.The scheduler gives you a lot of options when executing the models.The error handling is usually pretty good and the errors can be corrected fast.Incentivized
reduce the number of http port required by servicessimplified the binding connection amongst serviceshigh scalability and fast deployment of applicationsIncentivized
Although the scenarios may be online, the main service usually freezes and the processes can't transact any data. With a single restart of the service, the processes will be functioning again.The support for more applications would be nice, even though there is a nice number of them. Most of the main applications in the market are supported.The licensing for the software may be a little confusing; you can't buy individual licenses as they come in packages of four.Incentivized
health check of services and application features has been released with a lot of bugs that have never been fixedit is not so simple to apply the security policy to service/reference bindingIncentivized
Honestly, we have only used and evaluated magic xpi/xpa platforms because of the recommendation of our SAP Business One main supplier, who has previously used the platform for their developments. So far, we have no regrets with the acquisition of the platform and we are very happy with its performance.Incentivized
TIBCO service grid has been chosen as a natural selection of the TIBCO product evolution. The high flexibility and the binding virtualization fits very well with client needs for its EAI applications due to the huge number of services and applications, the management of application dependencies during deployment, the advantage of perfect integration with EMS for loggingIncentivized
The implementation time for this kind of projects has been greatly reduced.Certifying an In-House resource in the Magix xpi and xpa platforms is probably the best option, considering all of the projects that can be developed in the future without the need of an external consultant.The processes that have been automatized with the Magic xpi platform helped reduce human error and the time those processes took to finish.Incentivized
The integration of old BW with BWSE and its interface quite similar to design time has reduced the cost of training for developersThe TIBCO support for this product is no the best and clients complains too much about this. This required to find a workaround or force the client to move to new/or different product. Huge impact on ROIIncentivized