ManageWP is a WordPress management console that allows users to manage multiple WordPress sites with ease.
N/A
TYPO3
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
TYPO3 CMS is an open source web content management system with a global community, backed by the approximately 900 members of the TYPO3 Association.
$0
Pricing
ManageWP
TYPO3
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ManageWP
TYPO3
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Starting is easy and free. Premium upgrades are there for those that need more. If you want to free up your time and let ManageWP do the heavy lifting - we are there for you with a number of automations (safe updates, automated backups, scheduled security and performance checks, etc.), site migration tools, website templates and more.
Special bundles were built for agencies and companies creating affordable discounts for customers with large number of websites.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ManageWP
TYPO3
Features
ManageWP
TYPO3
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
ManageWP
9.5
6 Ratings
15% above category average
TYPO3
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.56 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
ManageWP
10.0
5 Ratings
25% above category average
TYPO3
-
Ratings
API
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
ManageWP
8.2
9 Ratings
5% above category average
TYPO3
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Admin section
9.88 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page templates
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Library of website themes
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
7.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publishing workflow
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
If you are a WordPress development shop, or host a number of WordPress websites, this is for you. Even if you only have one website but are looking for an easy way to make updates, schedule backups and keep track of the maintenance of your site, this would be a great tool. The cost is reasonable and it saves time, while adding peace of mind with "Safe" updates.
TYPO3 is great if you need to connect some systems in company to work together: like ecommerce + CRM + ERP + MRP and build an Extranet for partners/dealers where they can order your products, see particular BOM (bill of material), paid/unpaid invoices and use email marketing on top of it. You can do it but keep in mind that you will need a dedicated hosting, well organized admin(s) and some handwritten code. For simple blog TYPO3 is also a good choose, but WP would be better I think.
Managed Wordpress Updates - ManageWP allows you to update all out-of-date themes, plugins and core files on all your websites with the click of a button.
Automated Backups - ManageWP allows users to setup an automated schedule of backups (including free monthly backups).
Maintenance & Development Mode - ManageWP allows users to place a specific site into Maintenance or Development Mode, allowing them to block users from accessing the site with a click of a button.
compared do Wordpress - far less community support
when you run a simple blog - it is simple as piece of cake. But if it is a large news site, with many user roles, extensions and permissions - it may be hard to find an admin that will organize and keep that stuff working.
server resources: so you want performance and speed with all that modules enabled? make sure that you have dedicated server in most cases. WP works much better here.
Prior to ManageWP, we utilized InfiniteWP, a free (with paid extensions), self-hosted alternative. We found the interface to be unwieldy, and the paid extension pricing to be a bit confusing. The headache of maintaining the software and server infrastructure to run the platform, overshadowed the cost savings for us.