Meliora Testlab vs. SpiraTeam

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Meliora Testlab
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$45
per month
SpiraTeam
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Inflectra SpiraTeam is a project Management solution built around capabilities such as bug tracking, quality assurance, and collaboration.
$57.33
per month per concurrent user
Pricing
Meliora TestlabSpiraTeam
Editions & Modules
Basic
$45
per month
Cloud
$57.33
per month per concurrent user
Download
$558.00
per year per concurrent user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Meliora TestlabSpiraTeam
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual billing. Billed by concurrent users (3 minimum). Discount available for larger amount of concurrent users.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Meliora TestlabSpiraTeam
Considered Both Products
Meliora Testlab

No answer on this topic

SpiraTeam
Chose SpiraTeam
The ease of use, the configurable options per project, and the price were clear pluses for SpiraTeam.
Chose SpiraTeam
Best return on investment tool in the market; modern tool and architecture, and absolutely a great product for the money.
Best Alternatives
Meliora TestlabSpiraTeam
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Meliora TestlabSpiraTeam
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Meliora TestlabSpiraTeam
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
It is easy to define structures and documentation "modules". This allows for a workgroup-oriented approach and supports SCRUM. However, in the medical device market SCRUM does not work well for documentation. Therefore the modularized approach on the requirements and testing side supports sprint development, while the depth of documentation needed for compliance may not be "ready" and can be completed later.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Good Defect Tracking
  • Easy to maintain Test Cycle
  • Configurable Reports
  • Easy to maintain Roles and access
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Reporting could be made a bit easier.
  • Some functions are not always absolutely intuitive.
  • Document baselining can be tricky.
  • Some configuration can only be done in the database and is not explained as by the books.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The usability is excellent in most cases but lacks some intuitive functions, such as a copy to the clipboard for selected items. In fact, in an older version, a COPY button copied all selected records rather than putting it on the clipboard. The button has been renamed recently to CLONE, otherwise, my rating would be lower.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
None Other Used
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Better historical information about what happend in past releases, deeper integration with the whole software development life cycle.
Read full review
ScreenShots