Likelihood to Recommend I personally would prefer other products on the market right now such as Microsoft
Team Foundation Server and Test Manager. I think having a product like Caliber that can only do requirements without integrating with a another system makes things a little more time consuming.
Read full review We tried the Modern Requirements4DevOps AddIn to see if it brings a added value to our development. I have to say that I would distinguish between types of projects in which it is beneficial and in which it is probably "over engineering". Certainly, bigger development projects with higher complexity are more suitable than small and not really complex projects. However, for the bigger projects Modern Requirements4DevOps definitely helps to deal with the complexity as it adds way more contextualisation to the various entities. It really helps to understand which requirements led to which action in a diagram or task during development. It helps to control the complexity and inform all team members along the project.
Read full review Pros Borland Caliber tracks functional and non-functional requirements pretty easily. You can easily add a requirement and attach a spreadsheet or a picture if needed. Moving the hierarchy of requirements is fairly easy by just dragging and dropping. Assigning users to approve requirements is simple by the fields included when adding a requirement and then submitting for review. Read full review Smart Documents Building a connection between individual entities (requirements, documents, tasks, tests) Requirements Management and Reporting Read full review Cons I think Borland Caliber visually needs to be updated. It looks very out of date compared to other products on the market. The text box has a notepad feel to it and it's hard to make it visually catching. Borland Caliber needs to be easier to integrate with other testing and development products on the market. Having fields more related to URS and FRS would be helpful to auto-link to a document. So enter in a URS or FRS document ID at the beginning of a project in Caliber and then auto-assigning requirement IDs to link to pieces of code or test cases and having the user be able to decide a naming convention. Borland Caliber needs a specific table for linking to a document ID and then each requirement could auto-generate a sub ID for each requirement to make the process of filling in User Requirements and Functional Requirements more efficient. Then the user should be able to modify the sub ID if the naming convention needed to be different. Read full review forms could be transferred into in line fields to allow in line maintenance of data make window management of diagram builder more flexibility to make more space to build diagrams I would wish that the performance is a bit better sometimes, loading times can be quite long in some cases Read full review Alternatives Considered I think Borland Caliber is better than
Atlassian Confluence and has way more options for ease of use and reporting.
Team Foundation Server is my personal choice as it comes as a package for developers to link to requirements easily and link to test cases. Borland Caliber is visually the least attractive of the three systems I have used. If you need just a requirement manager for tracking and reporting then Borland Caliber is a great choice.
Read full review Modern Requirements4DevOps is an AddIn for
Azure DevOps Server (Microsoft Azure DevOps) and extends the native features of Azure DevOps in the area of Requirements Engineering, Requirements Management and Reporting. Azure DevOps already contains tons of valuable features. However, for bigger and more complex projects Modern Requirements4DevOps extends Azure DevOps by further features. Thus we used both products alongside.
Read full review Return on Investment Having Borland Caliber would be nice if you only need to track requirements and your company does not do any developing or testing. It does link very well with HP Quality Center for requirement and test asset tracking and ease of use. Borland Caliber is cheaper than a lot of other products on the market that have the same features. Read full review Better communication --> thus less misunderstandings More Transparency about requirements --> adds context and helps to build a common understanding Traceability of Requirements --> we used the baseline also to look into the history of requirements to understand how certain requirements have changed Read full review ScreenShots