TrustRadius

OpenText Silk Test vs. SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Silk Test
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Formerly from Micro Focus, and earlier from Borland, OpenText™ Silk Test automates functional testing for web, mobile, rich-client, and enterprise applications. Its collaborative test design helps business and technical stakeholders work together for a full range of test coverage.N/A
SoapUI Open Source
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
SoapUI is an open source API testing tool supported by SmartBear's community, supporting functional and performance testing of APIs.N/A
Pricing
OpenText Silk TestSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Silk TestSoapUI Open Source
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Silk TestSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Best Alternatives
OpenText Silk TestSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Silk TestSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Silk TestSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
Good for simple requests, simple scripts, assertions, and small workflows. Also not bad with the Open Source version if savvy with code as you can do a lot with custom functionality.Free version has limited compatibility with scripts/projects created from the Pro version, but functionality-wise can probably be made up with coding. As such, the free version may not be too suitable for complex scripts or for those who are not familiar with coding as functionality/usability may be limited.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
  • Ease of implementation
  • Ease of use
  • User friendly interface
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
  • I actually like SoapUI as it is, I have not found things to improve, except for the speed of response is very complex services.
Abraham García | TrustRadius Reviewer
Abraham García
Web Development Manager
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
Compared to SoapUI, we have been using "light" tools like RestClient extension in Firefox, or Postman. Compared to Postman, SoapUI is more simple for WSDL / SOAP webservices, as SoapUI generate all envelop, but Postman does not. For Rest API, I think that Postman is a little above SoapUI, but not too far away.
JD
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
  • Testing resolves most of the issues in the development phases.
  • User friendliness of the app makes it good.
  • Overall client happiness depends on the clean project, which is possible by testing.
Ajay Kumar | TrustRadius Reviewer
Ajay Kumar
Software Developer
Read full review
ScreenShots