Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs. Palo Alto Networks SaaS Security (CASB)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (formerly Microsoft Cloud App Security) is a multimode cloud access security broker.N/A
Palo Alto Networks SaaS Security (CASB)
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
The Palo Alto Networks' Next-Gen CASB solution (replacing the former Aperture product) has the capacity to keep any and all of your SaaS apps secure across the enterprise and in real time. Its data protection features help users contain the rapid implementation of SaaS products while enabling a hybrid workforce. NG-CASB scans all traffic, ports and protocols, automatically discovers new apps and leverages its API-based coverage of SaaS apps, including coverage for modern collaboration apps like…N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsPalo Alto Networks SaaS Security (CASB)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsPalo Alto Networks SaaS Security (CASB)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsPalo Alto Networks SaaS Security (CASB)
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsPalo Alto Networks SaaS Security (CASB)
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.8 out of 10
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.8 out of 10
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsPalo Alto Networks SaaS Security (CASB)
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(11 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsPalo Alto Networks SaaS Security (CASB)
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is well suited when working with other Microsoft Applications. For example, if you are working with Microsoft Office 365 it works very well when implementing CASB features. It works when implementing monitoring or blocks on Sanctioned applications however customizing the message to users is not that great.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Pros
Microsoft
  • The integration to Microsoft Entra ID is seamless, which allows Conditional Access to redirect the session to Microsoft Defender for Cloud App for it to take actions (Block or Monitor).
  • Tracker users' activity is very good when troubleshooting or running an investigate.
  • Detecting risky users through tight integration with Microsoft Entra ID is a very good feature.
  • Detecting mass downloads and blocking the download of files from non-manage company devices is a very good feature as well.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Cons
Microsoft
  • It takes some time to scan and apply the policies when there is some sensitive information.
  • After it applies the policies, it works, but there is a delay.
  • It doesn't provide any way to scan Microsoft Teams when an external exchange of images is happening. You can always do the filtering on the documents during the chat, but if there is an image, then some kind of OCR capability is required to detect it. At present, there is no way [Microsoft Cloud App Security] can go and detect those kinds of images and alert us
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
The interface is pretty simple and easy to use; however, you will need to do a lot of investigative research on your own to get comfortable with it. Originally, many of the Microsoft security tools had their own seperate consoles. Overtime, they have blended into one interface which is the ideal state. In some cases it is clear Microsoft had to pick which console a certain feature or setting was going to reside in and this leads to some confusion. For example, DLP is managed through Defender for Cloud Apps but you will also need to jump into Purview. For things like reverse proxy on your M365 tenant, you will need to go into Azure and setup conditional access rules. Not a big problem and I can understand why the settings are located where they are but for someone just starting out with Defender for Cloud Apps, it will take some time to figure out.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
I have not utilized actual support but the Sales and Product teams have been super helpful in moving our implementation forward and showing us the best practices.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
More flexible and more features with easy integration with cloud services like Microsoft Azure and other cloud services. Overall both gives similar features but we prefer Microsoft cloud app security due to its high threat detection rate. mostly we have been able to stop the threat in very very less time.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Cloud App Security saves us thousands of dollars finding and rectifying apps security issues
  • Identity Security Posture helps the organization identity stay in shape, saving thousands of dollars on security consultations
  • The cost of suffering a breach cannot be quantified, CAS helps minimize the chances of the attackers succeeding, with excellent historical logging for most operations
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots