Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. RiskIQ
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management. | $2.50 per user/per month |
RiskIQ | Score9.7 out of 10 | N/A | RiskIQ offers attack surface management, providing discovery, intelligence, and mitigation of threats associated with an organization’s digital presence. With more than 75 percent of attacks originating outside the firewall, RiskIQ helps enterprises to gain unified insight and control over web, social and mobile exposures. RiskIQ’s platform combines Internet data reconnaissance and analytics to expedite investigations, understand digital attack surfaces, assess risk, and take action to protect… | N/A |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | RiskIQ | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | RiskIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 157 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
99% Delivers good value for the price 146 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
95% Happy with the feature set 155 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 130 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
95% Implementation went as expected 140 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | RiskIQ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | RiskIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | RiskIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.4 | - |
| Usability | 8.6 | - |
| Availability | 9.1 | - |
| Performance | 9.1 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 7.3 | - |
| Configurability | 8.2 | - |
| Product Scalability | 9.1 | - |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | RiskIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Screenshots |






