Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. SonicWall Capture Client

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management.
$2.50
per user/per month
SonicWall Capture Client
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR) capabilities, including behavior-based malware protection, advanced threat hunting and visibility into application vulnerabilities. The SonicWall Capture Client offers next-gen antivirus protection with built-in autonomous EDR. Its synergy with the SonicWall platform allows for increased visibility and protection both on and off network.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for EndpointSonicWall Capture Client
Editions & Modules
Academic
$2.50
per user/per month
Standalone
$5.20
per user/per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Defender for EndpointSonicWall Capture Client
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Defender for EndpointSonicWall Capture Client
Features
Microsoft Defender for EndpointSonicWall Capture Client
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
8.7
78 Ratings
2% above category average
SonicWall Capture Client
-
Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology8.975 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.177 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Management8.777 Ratings00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support7.210 Ratings00 Ratings
Infection Remediation9.075 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management8.672 Ratings00 Ratings
Malware Detection9.276 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Defender for EndpointSonicWall Capture Client
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.3 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Defender for EndpointSonicWall Capture Client
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(133 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.4
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Defender for EndpointSonicWall Capture Client
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
It's basically good for any company when you have any amount of machines that need to be protected. It's just a good endpoint detection method that makes it well-suited for a lot of scenarios. If you're in business, it's probably something you need.
Read full review
SonicWall
No answers on this topic
Pros
Microsoft
  • Definitely on the threat action and response. We didn't have a stress-response option before, but the dependent brand point provided it instantly. Also, it's doing UVA and machine learning, which we didn't have before. So it's definitely providing more sophisticated threat-detection capabilities than we had before.
Read full review
SonicWall
No answers on this topic
Cons
Microsoft
  • That's a tough one because I don't have many cons on the product. Maybe the con is really around reporting. It's harder to get to the reporting and the analytics side. We have to do some of the custom reporting on our own, either through Power BI and whatnot. So the out-of-the-box reporting could be improved upon.
Read full review
SonicWall
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Cost add-ons for Security features is nickel and diming the process to keep pace with cybercrime. Limited Education budgets require us to be more pro-active in finding cost-effective measures to protect our devices, staff and students. Defender is a strong, well-featured product that is pricing itself out of the education market
Read full review
SonicWall
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a great EDR to have that works quickly and silently in the background and it integrates well with other Microsoft services. As an IT manager, I can appreciate that I do not get bombarded by alerts for every small detail. On the flipside, the management site can use some work in being more clear and should be more streamlined so I'm not clicking through multiple pages to figure out what happened
Read full review
SonicWall
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint chugs along just fine no matter what we throw at it and what systems it's running on. It doesn't take up a lot of resources either, so that's welcomed.
Read full review
SonicWall
No answers on this topic
Performance
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is easy on memory and resources on clients.
Read full review
SonicWall
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
The first time I tried to onboard my macOS endpoints to MDE I struggled for quite a bit. I had to reach out to Microsoft's MDE support team. The tech was very helpful in walking me through the steps during a screen share session
Read full review
SonicWall
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Deployment was handled by our team here and everything went pretty smoothly. We did have a few hiccups in our test group, but that only took a bit to get ironed out.
Read full review
SonicWall
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint consistently showed better user experiences during scans due to the reduced amount of resources used on each system compared to our previous endpoint protection solutions. However, the main reason we chose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is that it was part of our G5 licensing and integrated with all of our systems
Read full review
SonicWall
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is easily scaled from small orgs to giant enterprises.
Read full review
SonicWall
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Reduced incidents of security breaches lead to lower remediation costs and avoid potential financial losses and reputational damage.
  • Reduces the need for additional third-party security solutions and training, thereby lowering overall security management costs.
  • Increased efficiency and productivity of IT staff lead to better allocation of resources and cost savings.
  • Reduces the risk of fines and sanctions associated with non-compliance, ensuring business continuity and protecting revenue.
Read full review
SonicWall
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Screenshots

Screenshot of blocked activitiesScreenshot of Detects & respondsScreenshot of discovers vulnerabilityScreenshot of Eliminates blind spotsScreenshot of Risk management