Microsoft Defender for IoT vs. Qualys TruRisk Platform
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Defender for IoT | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft states users can protect IoT/OT devices and get visibility into risk with Microsoft Defender for IoT (formerly Azure Defender for IoT), boasting agentless network monitoring for asset discovery, vulnerability management, and continuous threat detection across IoT/OT devices whether they’re unmanaged devices or managed devices provisioned via Azure IoT Hub. Features an integration with Azure Sentinel and third-party solutions. Deploy in either on-premises or Azure-connected… | N/A |
Qualys TruRisk Platform | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | Qualys TruRisk Platform (formerly Qualys Cloud Platform, or Qualysguard), from San Francisco-based Qualys, is network security and vulnerability management software featuring app scanning and security, network device mapping and detection, vulnerability prioritization schedule and remediation, and other features to provide vulnerability management and network attack surface reduction. | N/A |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Defender for IoT | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 85% Would buy again 17 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 87% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 85% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 15 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Defender for IoT | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 8.6 |
| Usability | - | 2.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 5.0 |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT | Qualys TruRisk Platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |


