Microsoft Entra External ID vs. Arculix by SecureAuth

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Entra External ID
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Entra External ID (formerly Azure Active Directory B2C, or alternately, Azure Active Directory External Identities) provides business-to-customer identity as a service. Customers can use their preferred social, enterprise, or local account identities to get single sign-on access to applications and APIs.
$0
per month per active users
Arculix by SecureAuth
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Launched in August of 2022, Arculix is SecureAuth's next generation access management and passwordless authentication solution, with options available to secure workforces and employee identities, as well as customer identities with continuous authentication.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Entra External IDArculix by SecureAuth
Editions & Modules
Premium P1 (for More than 50,000 MAU)
$0.00325
per month per active users
Premium P2 (for More than 50,000 MAU)
$0.01625
per month per active users
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Entra External IDArculix by SecureAuth
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsA flat fee of $0.03 is billed for each SMS/Phone-based multi-factor authentication attempt.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Entra External IDArculix by SecureAuth
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Entra External ID
Chose Microsoft Entra External ID
For us as we already used microsoft platforms it made perfect sense to remain within one eco system rather than split external ID systems if we could. We did however look closely at AWS as a comparison and chose Microsoft Entra External ID based on our end users (familiarity) …
Chose Microsoft Entra External ID
Microsoft Entra has much more advanced features than Amazon cognito. The access permission feature, mfa, data protection is top notch. Amazon cognito does offer MFA but the security access feature is not very great. The Microsoft Entra offers a wide selection of access …
Chose Microsoft Entra External ID
I really enjoy how simple it is to connect this Active Directory with other Microsoft Products to collaborate with colleagues and clients.
Chose Microsoft Entra External ID
Each one of these alternatives has pros and cons. PingOne from Ping Identity states they "help deliver the secure and seamless customer experience to win battles for customer acquisition, retention, revenue, loyalty, and trust." While that may be the case, they did not fit our …
Chose Microsoft Entra External ID
The best selling points for Azure Active Directory B2C that stand out from the competition are:
  • Pricing, both at small and very large scale (and in between), is hard to beat
  • The seamless integration with Azure should make Azure Active Directory B2C the first choice of CIAM …
Arculix by SecureAuth

No answer on this topic

Features
Microsoft Entra External IDArculix by SecureAuth
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Entra External ID
9.4
Ratings
13% above category average
Arculix by SecureAuth
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Password Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Risk Management9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Entra External IDArculix by SecureAuth
Small Businesses
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Entra External IDArculix by SecureAuth
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Entra External IDArculix by SecureAuth
Likelihood to Recommend
It is not easy to calculate the actual ROI due to the difficult quantification of all factors, but it certainly contributed a lot in protecting, monitoring and controlling access to our system. It also made it much easier to detect vulnerable external users with simple and "easy to hack" passwords they use on multiple apps.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • One of the things that Microsoft Entra External ID does really well is creating user logins, accounts and profile. It is very easy to create them, manage them and delete them. It is fast and reliant.
  • Limit access or authorization feature. We can allow different levels of authorization and access. So that not all the employees would have access to all the data. Only some relaible employees would have access and power to change anything.
  • Mutli factor authentication feature is also a really good feature to secure data. Even overseas vendors need MFS to login which gives double protection to our data.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Troubleshooting diagnostic logs effectively requires VS Code
  • Group and role management requires additional effort
  • The programming model (XML) could use some developer experience love
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft Entra External ID is an all round solid product, and certainly delivers the solution to our needs well. Through use we found that Pupil's become 'experts in avoidance', if they can forget their login details or indeed their device used for MFA, they will and then use that as the excuse for not accessing/completing their assignments. If more MFA options were available (such as delegated MFA) this would really help iron out our entire end user experiences
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
For us as we already used microsoft platforms it made perfect sense to remain within one eco system rather than split external ID systems if we could. We did however look closely at AWS as a comparison and chose Microsoft Entra External ID based on our end users (familiarity) with microsoft authentication and deployment routines. We also found that Microsoft gave more sovereignty assurances with our data.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Having monthly active users billing was cost-effective.
  • Helped with the IT support that was already managing the Azure platform of the company; this helped to manage the costs better and optimize them.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots