Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs. Symantec IGA

For creating and managing Users in AD, Roles and groups assignment

Incentivized

If an organization is looking for a good comprehensive identity management/governance suite that is easy to implement, CA identity manager may be a good/robust product. It is best to understand specific use case for your organization and try out the product before a final purchase decision as is the case with all sw products.

Incentivized

• Identity Management
• Privilege management
• Entitlement Management

Incentivized

• It has complete identity management and governance capabilities equipped with a simple, intuitive user experience and helps simplify processes such as user access requests and access certifications. This in turn helps in improved productivity and user satisfaction.

Incentivized

• Workflow configuration
• emergency admin elevation

Incentivized

• Bringing on new users and removing existing user when new employee/contractors join or leave an organization can be improved by linking directly to HR module.
• The slightly complicated GUI makes drill down difficult for a new user.

Incentivized

The main reason to select the Azure AD Security Governance is that it helps us to achieve and have great security governance on the entire organization Structure.

Incentivized

The final contenders were CA and Oracle - Oracle was tedious to implement and maintain while on the other hand CA was easy to implement and maintain and came at a much lower price.

Incentivized

• Azure AD Security Governance Users and roles
• Active directory groups to reduce the security issues
• Increased redundancy

Incentivized

• For us, it was a fairly easy implementation over 60 day period that provided ROI fairly quickly

Incentivized