Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Trellix Mobile Security vs. Zscaler Data Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is used to provide intelligent detection and control of sensitive information across Office 365, OneDrive, SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and on the endpoint. It also helps prevent data loss through identifying and preventing risky or inappropriate sharing, transfer, or use of sensitive data on endpoints, apps, and services.N/A
McAfee MDP
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Trellix Mobile sits directly on mobile devices to provide always-on protection no matter how a device is connected—via a corporate network, public access point, or cellular carrier, and even offline. And its machine learning algorithms analyze device behavior deviations to uncover indicators of compromise and accurately identify advanced device, application, and network-based attacks.N/A
Zscaler Data Security
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Zscaler Data Security is a cloud-delivered platform built to safeguard an organization's sensitive data. It locates sensitive data, understands its risk exposure, and secures sensitive data across the web, email, workloads, private apps, and BYOD endpoints.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionTrellix Mobile SecurityZscaler Data Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionMcAfee MDPZscaler Data Security
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionTrellix Mobile SecurityZscaler Data Security
Considered Multiple Products
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
We are a complete Microsoft shop. Competitors, we have come across Symantec DLP, that's one. We've come across Nexscope DLP. I've personally migrated customers from Nextscope DLP to Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention. There is McAfee DLP as well, which we have worked with. …
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
I don't think anything that Microsoft does, I've tried to conversate. We haven't even discussed another option. It does it well. So for us, it's pretty much going to stay where it is for now.
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is included in the E5 license as part of other purchases, so we've done what we can to get the best functionality from it. We are actively investigating implementing Veronas or Cyera just simply because the on-prem capabilities are not …
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Veronis. So we were with Veronis, and we didn't like how they did things, so we went to the Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention.
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
The licensing is maybe the biggest reason. Purview Data Loss Prevention is included in the Microsoft 365 SKU we already have, so if the functionality is equivalent, it makes sense to save money. We also appreciate how Purview automatically integrates with other Microsoft 365 …
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Varonis provided great visibility into file permissions and audit records. It did not provide DLP controls for things like email, and endpoints therefore making it incomplete to provide proactive controls against DLP threats.
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Symantec or now? Brocom. Forcepoint, GPV. I'm trying to think of, there's a couple more. I can't think of the top of my head. I would say closer to the bottom then rather than the top. So because of the fact that yes, it integrates well. But in terms of the actual …
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
We looked at Varonis and there was one other one whose name I don't remember. So I guess it wasn't that good.
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
AI Cyber Experts Cybersecurity as a Service (CSaaS)
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Not used any product other than Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention. As I mentioned in my earlier point that we did all the researches for the best suitable product for our environment, but Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention proved to be best and is working as per our …
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
There are much more comprehensive and granular DLP solutions out there like Trellix and Sophos but ultimately they are expensive and require significant administrative oversight for implementation and deployment. For a company of our size, they are just not economically …
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
The DLP in Exchange Online and Purview by proxy is okay, but fails to catch a lot of HIPAA-specific information. We supplemented with Barracuda to make up for it. Purview is still better at identification across the entire tenant though, Barracuda is just doing our email DLP.
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
overall better coverage and integration with Microsoft products. also, it was the most reasonable solution for us.
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
The DLP was already part of our tenant so we saved money by using it. With others, we would have to built/implement VMs to connect to the tenant, which we were not willing do. Since we had access to it, we decided to stick with it and we are happy with that result
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
As the customer already had Microsoft Office 365 E5 license, it made sense to implement Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention instead of other products.
Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Centralized management, supports Hybrid Environment, Easy integration with Microsoft products and cloud features.
McAfee MDP
Chose McAfee MDP
McAfee Mobile Data Protection offers basic security measures for mobile computing devices without a high cost or extensive training. However, it also may lack some needed features such as data encryption utilized by other products. While its interface is not perfect, it is …
Zscaler Data Security
Chose Zscaler Data Security
Thought about deploying zero trust cloud within our environment, but we are still in the early stages of our digital transformation projects. Still evaluating current options, but we knew Zscaler Data Security took a strict approach to data, so that's what we wanted to evaluate.
Chose Zscaler Data Security
Microsoft Purview Audit, Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager, Microsoft Purview Information Protection, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management, Securiti and Cyera
Chose Zscaler Data Security
Clients need to consolidate tooling, and Zscaler beats CrowdStrike and Palo in the endpoint and web DLP space.
Chose Zscaler Data Security
Proofpoint Data Discover
Chose Zscaler Data Security
Comparitively, I think that both of them work pretty well.
Chose Zscaler Data Security
Zscaler Data protection must be used in conjunction with other Zscaler tools where the others are stand alone. It is mainly the cost that drove us to look at Zscaler's product again, although, we do still use Proof point for DLP and email security
Chose Zscaler Data Security
Zscaler's feature, roadmap, and LLM incorporation to bring about contextual intelligence for detections are why we selected Zscaler over Varonis.
Chose Zscaler Data Security
ZScaler provides many more channels and integrations than the competition.
Features
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionTrellix Mobile SecurityZscaler Data Security
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
9.5
Ratings
18% above category average
Trellix Mobile Security
-
Ratings
Zscaler Data Security
7.7
Ratings
3% below category average
Data Encryption9.50 Ratings00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionTrellix Mobile SecurityZscaler Data Security
Small Businesses
Paubox Email Suite
Paubox Email Suite
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Paubox Email Suite
Paubox Email Suite
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Sophos Mobile
Sophos Mobile
Score 8.4 out of 10
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionTrellix Mobile SecurityZscaler Data Security
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionTrellix Mobile SecurityZscaler Data Security
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is well suited to provide a consistent user experience. So all the different products blend together quite well for an office environment. So Teams connects well with Office Outlook. It connects well with SharePoint. So we have a unique connectivity experience in terms of the digital experience of a typical user. And now, with Copilot, it's a great mix and blend that empowers users to adopt AI in their day-to-day office work. And I think that's great.
Read full review
The program really excels at basic mobile protection against malware and viruses. It offers some unique features as its anti-theft application that can help keep mobile devices from being used by unauthorized users. It works well when providing basic security for mobile devices out in the field or in remote work situations. However, it companies may need more extensive or additional security applications to ensure adequate protection
Read full review
Great for network DLP, web, and endpoint monitoring. DSPM data discovery works well for key structured and unstructured data sources. An area for improvement is simplifying the interface into a single pane for reviewing incidents and making it part of the tooling, rather than a separate module with a fee (incident receiver).
Read full review
Pros
  • Extensive library for data content classifiers.
  • Strong integration with Microsoft products allowing effective controls to be applied (e.g. Exchange/M365 for email, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps to control web, SharePoint/OneDrive to apply policies on sharing.)
  • Insider Risk module provides visibility into suspicious activities which may not be detected by regular DLP rules.
Read full review
  • The program does well with virus and malware scanning abilities.
  • It also has a unique anti-theft feature that can help secure mobile devices.
  • The program offers multiple privacy roles that allows sharing of different levels of access to applications.
Read full review
  • If the policy is set correctly, it identifies DLP (Data Loss Prevention).
  • Scanning zip files to find executables works really well.
Read full review
Cons
  • Overall, Microsoft DLP is not my number one choice because there's not much flexibility. There's a lot of restrictions and the way they set up rules a lot really restrictive. Thus it takes a lot more time for my team to build the rules and establish the controls as needed. So it's very clunky in that way and they have not improved it over the years, but I know they're trying to get a better, however it takes time because Microsoft, as we all knows, not a really security centric company.
Read full review
  • The program could use some improvement in its setup and installation process.
  • Another area needing improvement could be its interactive interface.
  • Perhaps a learning tutorial or guide could be added to the application.
Read full review
  • The DLP dictionary functions need to be expanded upon, such as matching all regex patterns with any phrases and vice versa. The only way to do this today is to create two dictionaries and then use an engine to combine them; however, this approach loses the ability to utilize proximity.
  • Regex does not support lookaheads.
Read full review
Usability
Just because it's so easy to navigate and, for the most part, even areas that I don't know about, the support channels are very clear and concise, and they respond very quickly to whatever I need. They'll guide me through whatever I don't understand, and sometimes there are a lot of things added in there.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Zscaler Data Protection is a complete solution for protecting your valuable data. No matter whether the data resides at your on-prem, cloud, or any workload or at the data center, Zscaler has a foolproof mechanism to protect it at any cost with zero tolerance. Also, Zscaler Data Protection has a perfect UI for deploying, managing, and maintaining our different kinds of environments. (e.g., On-Prem or Hybrid).
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We are a complete Microsoft shop. Competitors, we have come across Symantec DLP, that's one. We've come across Nexscope DLP. I've personally migrated customers from Nextscope DLP to Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention. There is McAfee DLP as well, which we have worked with. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, definitely, because we don't require another agent to be deployed on Windows machines. It's part of the OS, easy deployment, easy onboarding. So also within email, SharePoint, OneDrive, customers don't have to build any other connectors. It's already integrated. All you have to do is start creating policies, start monitoring them. So the ease of deployment and integration across the Microsoft stack is what we like.
Read full review
McAfee Mobile Data Protection offers basic security measures for mobile computing devices without a high cost or extensive training. However, it also may lack some needed features such as data encryption utilized by other products. While its interface is not perfect, it is easier to learn than more feature robust products on the market.
Read full review
Thought about deploying zero trust cloud within our environment, but we are still in the early stages of our digital transformation projects. Still evaluating current options, but we knew Zscaler Data Security took a strict approach to data, so that's what we wanted to evaluate.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • From an ROI perspective, being able to have a robust DLP capability within 365 and with eShare, again, providing the defensive depth and keeping data 365 gives both us as well as our customers an ROI by being able to not use third party repositories to share data externally and by keeping data inside of 365. It gives me much more visibility into my data landscape. One of the things we advise our customers to do when they're starting to explore the advanced capabilities of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, for example, is to use that DLP product to monitor and understand the flows of sensitive data within the organization. By being able to look at that DLP, identify those sensitive niche types, and see which transactions occur internally within the organization, I get a clearer picture of what I'm doing.
Read full review
  • McAfee Mobile Data Protection provides a fairly easy and low cost security measure for providing basic to medium security for mobile devices. While not perfect, it does it basic job fairly well.
  • The program may require a bit of a learning curve for some end users with its interface and installation processes. This may require some additional training or support.
  • The program lacks some of the more advanced data protection abilities found in other competitor products. The result may be a need for additional security applications.
Read full review
  • Positive - Product reliability and effectivity.
  • Positive - Deployment and securing the environment.
  • Negative - Pricing are on higher side among the peers.
  • Negative - Customer Support has to be improve with skill engineers.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Screenshots

Screenshot of pre-built policy templates to easily get startedScreenshot of DLP analytics to help recommend new policies and fine tune existing onesScreenshot of the step that enables one policy to be applied to several locationsScreenshot of then next step, that enables policies to be scoped to specific users and user groupsScreenshot of composite conditions using groups of AND /OR and exceptions with NOTScreenshot of granular restrictions for different actions