Microsoft R Open and Revolution R Enterprise are big data R distribution for servers, Hadoop clusters, and data warehouses. Microsoft acquired original developer Revolution Analytics in 2016.
Microsoft R is available in two editions: Microsoft R Open (formerly Revolution R Open) and Revolution R Enterprise.
N/A
pandas
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
pandas is an open source, BSD-licensed library providing high-performance data structures and data analysis tools for the Python programming language. pandas is a Python package providing expressive data structures designed to make working with “relational” or “labeled” data both easier. It aims to be the fundamental high-level building block for doing practical, real-world data analysis in Python.
N/A
Pricing
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
pandas
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
pandas
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
pandas
Features
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
pandas
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
5.3
3 Ratings
45% below category average
pandas
8.5
1 Ratings
2% above category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources
6.13 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources
6.03 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection
6.03 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
MDM Integration
3.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
7.0
3 Ratings
19% below category average
pandas
-
Ratings
Visualization
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
4.8
3 Ratings
52% below category average
pandas
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment
5.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Transformations
5.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Encryption
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Built-in Processors
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
6.0
3 Ratings
33% below category average
pandas
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools
5.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning
5.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
If you are a MS shop specifically, or have more generic data requirement needs from Microsoft sourced data this will work well. If you have a lot of disparate data across a number of unique platforms/cloud systems/3rd party hosted data warehouses then this product will have issues or a lack of documentation on the net. Performance-wise this product is equal to other R platforms out there.
There are a lot of libraries and ways to do visualization. Sometimes it is very confusing.
Error handling can be a challenge. Sometimes the error messages do not provide valuable clues for the debugging.
In our case, there are a bunch of different frameworks and libraries working together. I would rather work with one framework, well tuned for my use case
In general, Revolution Analytics brings a lot of value to the organization. The renewal decision would be based on return on investment in terms of quantified actionable insights that are getting generated against the cost of the product. Additionally, market brand of the tool and reputation risk in terms of possible acquisition and its impact to overall organizational analytic strategy would be considered as well.
It is good, easy to use, improvements are being made to the product and more info being shared in the community. It just needs some more time to become more integrated to other platforms and tools/data out there.
Generally support comes through the forums and user generated channels which are helpful, easy to access, quickly turned around and provided by knowledgeable users. However the support channels are not employees and the channels are often used as a way to learn quick difficult elements of R. Better design, users interface and tutorial options would alleviate the need for this sort of interaction.
The two are different products for different purposes. But for someone who has little or no experience in R programming, Power BI would be better for starting with. Having said that, Microsoft R is built on R, thus allowing for customization of complex calculations not typically available otherwise.
All these frameworks are great for gathering data and providing some initial analysis. But for real performance debugging work one needs more than tools provided by this tools. That's where the pandas excel.
Performance debugging was time consuming and mostly poorly automated exploratory process. Once we started use pandas for these tasks, it really moved the needle. Pandas are instrumental to provide actionable insights. As a result we were able to improve notably cloud software resource utilization and performance
Analytics implemented with pandas allow us to detect and. address problems in our APIs before they are notable to our customers