Likelihood to Recommend MockFlow is a great tool for low-fidelity wireframing for quick validation & contextualization of UX & UI hypotheses. It is not a substitute for full-fledged designing tools such as
Figma or Adobe XD.
Read full review Pros Ease of use. The UX is great. A decent number of pre-built UI elements such as browser frames, dropdowns, buttons, etc. Good prototyping ability. We can create decent prototypes using links. Collaborating capability for multiple members in a team. Ease of exporting the wires in different formats. Read full review Cons Grouping the similar elements together to further enhance the UX. Detailing the wires is still clumsy. Monochromatic UI can be improved a bit. Icon availability is limited. More collaboration features. Grouping of elements in the wires is cumbersome. Read full review Usability Easy UI & good UX makes the usability very convenient.
Read full review Alternatives Considered Figma is a high-fidelity designing tool and provides too many features which would be overkill if we are looking for basic prototyping. Also, if you are not a designer and just want to create basic wires or prototypes as a Business Analyst or Product Manager, MockFlow would suffice your needs. But if you are focusing on pixel-perfect designs then I would suggest going for
Figma . The ease of usability with MockFlow is very convenient as there would be a steep learning curve for
Figma .
Balsamiq is very similar to MockFlow but the wires created in it look a bit sketchy & clumsy.
Read full review Return on Investment Low turnaround time for creating wireframes resulting in aligning the team on a single path. Validating UX & UI hypothesis quickly leading to less rework & quicker results Saving to & fro time with parallel collaboration feature. Read full review ScreenShots