Overall Satisfaction with MockFlow
We use MockFlow for creating low-fidelity wireframes and prototyping to validate our business process flows and hypotheses. It is also used a create mock UI visualizations for referencing & contextualization.
- Ease of use. The UX is great.
- A decent number of pre-built UI elements such as browser frames, dropdowns, buttons, etc.
- Good prototyping ability. We can create decent prototypes using links.
- Collaborating capability for multiple members in a team.
- Ease of exporting the wires in different formats.
- Grouping the similar elements together to further enhance the UX.
- Detailing the wires is still clumsy.
- Monochromatic UI can be improved a bit.
- Icon availability is limited.
- More collaboration features.
- Grouping of elements in the wires is cumbersome.
- Multi-page wireframing
- Prototyping ability
- Exporting of wires in desired format.
- Low turnaround time for creating wireframes resulting in aligning the team on a single path.
- Validating UX & UI hypothesis quickly leading to less rework & quicker results
- Saving to & fro time with parallel collaboration feature.
Figma is a high-fidelity designing tool and provides too many features which would be overkill if we are looking for basic prototyping. Also, if you are not a designer and just want to create basic wires or prototypes as a Business Analyst or Product Manager, MockFlow would suffice your needs. But if you are focusing on pixel-perfect designs then I would suggest going for Figma. The ease of usability with MockFlow is very convenient as there would be a steep learning curve for Figma. Balsamiq is very similar to MockFlow but the wires created in it look a bit sketchy & clumsy.
Do you think MockFlow delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with MockFlow's feature set?
Yes
Did MockFlow live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of MockFlow go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy MockFlow again?
Yes
Using MockFlow
10 - Business Analysis, Product Managers, Software Engineers & Business Teams.
A basic understanding of UX & UI is needed to use the tool. To maintain any person from the Admin function is sufficient.
- Wireframing
- Prototyping
- Visualization of complicated concepts
Evaluating MockFlow and Competitors
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Prior Experience with the Product
Using MockFlow
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- Choosing elements
- Choosing UI screens
- Export
- Prototyping
- Detailing the wires
- Formatting