Moqups vs. Qlerify

The platform allows for easily documenting all sorts of processes and ideas in pretty much all departments you can think of. Whether it is a regular diagram, a UML prototype, a network architecture plan, or a BPMN process description, Moqups has you covered. We have not observed any situation where the platform has come short of expectations.

Extremely well suited for process development and since it closes the gap between ICT and Business, for software development. It is less appropriate in cases where swimlane type of process map doesn't suit well.

• Very simple interface
• Easy management of objects
• Easy sharing of diagrams
• Very complete library of objects

• Streamlined UI
• Real-time collaboration
• Jira integration

• Option to export to JSON
• Option to work with BPMN
• Option to work with/export descriptive languages such as PlantUML

• We would have like to known about them a bit earlier.

Moqups has so far been a remarkable competitor to the two well established draw.io and Lucidchart. We do not miss any features, in comparison, and transitioning from other previous platforms (draw.io, Lucidchat) did not translate into big friction. Cost was also a factor where Moqups was largely superior by far.

I haven't officially evaluated other process mapping tools. I have however used many tool during the past 30 years. Qlerify is first I am excited about.

• Moqups has allowed us to consolidate our diagraming in the organization.
• The sharing options have supported our documentation efforts.

• It has enabled me to achieve results faster
• Qlerify helps find better solutions
• Qlerify has enabled results we have not achieved with other tools
• Qlerify's collaboration features improve team and management buy-in