Morningstar Direct vs. Zephyr Enterprise

Morningstar Direct is great for classifying funds in order of performance and has a huge database to check against. Pretty much every category you can imagine is covered. It is best for research and analyzing before making big decisions. The interface is fairly clean and relatively simple to use.

Incentivized

1. Well suited for companies having several applications which need rigorous continuous testing cycles due to periodic upgrades to products/features.
2. Ideally suited for use cases where there is a need to run sanity and regression suites very frequently.
3. It is very helpful to have a traceability matrix across Stories/tasks and easy to link all the test cases to be covered to stories.
4. Variety of reports for Quality Dashboard.

Incentivized

• Best for research.
• Analyst reporting is fantastic.
• The ability to look at a wide variety of assets is great.

Incentivized

• Creation of Folders, Sub Folder and Releases for various Teams/Projects
• Ability to create cycles and adding cases to these
• Ability to copy/clone entire test cycles for regression/sanity needs
• Linking of defects to Test Cases

Incentivized

• The system is sometimes slow.
• Glitchy and sometimes hard to use.

Incentivized

• Better Test case Upload Utility
• Ability to quickly map test cases from excel to JIRA fields

Incentivized

Morningstar is slightly more buggy and laggy. But includes far more data and is more trusted.

Incentivized

Incentivized

• Returns not yet realised.

Incentivized

• Time saving and productivity enhancement for QA teams by preventing context and tool switching
• High observability to management via QA Dashboards

Incentivized