TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Movable Type

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AMovable Type is a Perl-based content management system from Six Apart, featuring the capability to host multiple weblogs and standalone content pages, manage files and user roles, templates, tags, categories, and trackback links.N/A
    Pricing
    Movable Type
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Movable Type
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Movable Type
    Considered Both Products
    Six Apart
    Chose Movable Type
    WordPress and Movable Type are the go to CMS for a reason - they are by far the easiest to navigate, learn, and use for daily blogging/content management. And now with more plug-ins available, these CMS products are getting more responsive and are offering capabilities (even …
    Incentivized
    Chose Movable Type
    I've used Joomla! and Drupal. Both are power CMSs but I found it easier to work with Movable Type. Every CMS has its positive and negative points, but I found more benefits to using Movable Type compared to Joomla! and Drupal.
    Chose Movable Type
    Movable Type is better than Wordpress because it generates static sites that cannot be broken by losing your database connection. The custom fields in MT are superior to Wordpress because of the way the fields are presented in the new content form. You need to get paid plugins …
    Chose Movable Type
    I believe that these two product are interchangeable for my purposes. I believe WordPress is slightly more complicated and prone to accidents to someone dealing solely with writing like myself; however, this seems to be the hot product right now, and Moveable Type may need to …
    Chose Movable Type
    I'd say Wordpress is better because it's free, but MT is better than Drupal,Joombla and Concrete5.
    Chose Movable Type
    Compared to other content management systems that I have used, Movable Type is certainly a top-of-the-line platform. It is my primary choice when building large and intense user-based websites. If I'm building something simple, like a client portfolio website, I may stick with …
    Chose Movable Type
    Movable Type is outdated and out of style with current blog design trends.
    Chose Movable Type
    Movable Type can be compared to WordPress. It's easy to use, and I would say Movable Type is actually more user-friendly.
    Chose Movable Type
    I have not used any other product except Movable Type for my job needs because this is a fairly new position for me. However, with the positive experiences that I have had with Movable Type thus far, I cannot imagine using another product to meet the demands of my job. I am …
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Movable Type
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Movable Type
    Feature
    Movable Type
    5.0
    1 Ratings
    49% below category average
    Role-based user permissions5.01 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Movable Type
    Feature
    Movable Type
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    26% below category average
    API6.01 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Movable Type
    Feature
    Movable Type
    6.4
    1 Ratings
    20% below category average
    WYSIWYG editor9.01 Ratings
    Code quality / cleanliness6.01 Ratings
    Admin section8.01 Ratings
    Page templates5.01 Ratings
    Library of website themes3.01 Ratings
    Mobile optimization / responsive design8.01 Ratings
    Publishing workflow9.01 Ratings
    Form generator3.01 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of Movable Type
    Feature
    Movable Type
    5.6
    1 Ratings
    29% below category average
    Content taxonomy9.01 Ratings
    SEO support6.01 Ratings
    Bulk management3.01 Ratings
    Availability / breadth of extensions3.01 Ratings
    Community / comment management7.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Movable Type
    Small Businesses
    Umbraco CMS
    Score7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Square Online
    Score7.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    RWS Tridion Sites
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Movable Type
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (10 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    5.4
    (9 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Movable Type
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Six Apart
    Is your business an enterprise level business that has more than a half dozen different content types? If so, then you might want to use a dedicated CMS rather than Movable Type. Movable Type is best used on small / medium sized businesses and is not the best solution for a full-fledged CMS. If you're using your content for something other than just displaying a website, then it's probably not for you. Movable Type works great for news/blogging sites. In fact, Daring Fireball, one of the most popular Apple-centric blogs is using Movable Type as its publishing platform.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Six Apart
    • Easy to use straight out of the box, very user friendly with an intuitive interface.
    • Great for team use where there are multiple editors and writers fixing and editing each other's works. It's easy to track who last made the latest edits.
    • Stellar support team and system. I've found that Moveable Type's support system is generally more responsive and helpful than WordPress.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Six Apart
    • Especially on the older versions, the limited number of well-developed third-party plugins is problematic for efficiently developing a well-functioning website.
    • Versions of movable type which didn't allow pages to be constructed were difficult to create continuity in design and easily editable pages for our editors.
    • The installation process could be simplified to make it easier for those new to a CMS to install.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Six Apart
    I think there are still improvements to be made. I haven't tapped in to the full functionality of the CMS yet but the rating I give it now is only based on what I've been able to use it for
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Six Apart
    Movable Type can be compared to WordPress. It's easy to use, and I would say Movable Type is actually more user-friendly.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Six Apart
    • Provided a blogging platform when we needed one.
    • Helped us compare other blogging platforms as a baseline for what minimums we require and what we don't want.
    • Users often refused to use Movable Type and would go around our official system in order to use my more friendly software.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots