MUGA is a web-based video conferencing system built to deliver a real-time communication and collaboration experience. In an era of rapid digitization, globalization of businesses, and geographically dispersed teams, the need for dynamic online meeting solutions has been on the rise. In response to the growing demand, the vendor states they have built MUGA as an all-inclusive virtual conferencing platform for seamless communication, effective collaboration, and better remote workforce…
$5.35
per user
streamGo
Score8 out of 10
N/A
streamGo is a provider of online events, producing a range of webinars webcasts, virtual events and podcasts across the UK, Europe and Worldwide. Use cases include Virtual Events, Hybrid Events, Webinars, Webcasts, and Podcasts.
N/A
Pricing
MUGA
streamGo
Editions & Modules
Monthly ( India )
$5.35
per user
Yearly ( India )
$57.82
per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MUGA
streamGo
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$5.35 per user
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
MUGA
streamGo
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of MUGA and streamGo
Feature
MUGA
6.8
1 Ratings
15% below category average
streamGo
8.5
1 Ratings
4% above category average
High quality audio
8.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
High quality video
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile support
4.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of MUGA and streamGo
Feature
MUGA
6.5
1 Ratings
20% below category average
streamGo
-
Ratings
Desktop sharing
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Whiteboards
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of MUGA and streamGo
Feature
MUGA
7.3
1 Ratings
11% below category average
streamGo
7.8
1 Ratings
4% below category average
Calendar integration
7.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Meeting initiation
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Record meetings / events
9.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Slideshows
6.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Event registration
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of MUGA and streamGo
Feature
MUGA
7.0
1 Ratings
14% below category average
streamGo
7.0
1 Ratings
19% below category average
Live chat
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Q&A
6.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Audience polling
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of MUGA and streamGo
Feature
MUGA
10.0
1 Ratings
21% above category average
streamGo
8.0
1 Ratings
4% below category average
User authentication
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions
10.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Confidential attendee list
10.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of MUGA and streamGo
Feature
MUGA
-
Ratings
streamGo
6.5
1 Ratings
17% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Online Events Marketing
Comparison of Online Events Marketing features of MUGA and streamGo
It is great for international use. It has good features, and the security is above and beyond. The service level if I/we have a problem could be better as their customer service is not quick to respond, but other than the occasional glitch, it is the best platform we have experienced and much better than MS Teams. Ease of use - easy set up for new employees inside the co and out.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is one of the best platforms for attending webinars related to the distribution of knowledge related to different technologies and software and live events related to software releases and other product-related releases. The video streaming and software quality of the platform itself can be massively improved, in my opinion.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Easy to use and very few complaints. But the usability on the front end was not easy as we had difficult setting up the contract and thus the first call. Timing was urgent and it took too long to get a rep to call us back and that put us in a bind and we had to use another web product
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Mostly because of the cost-cutting and being able to access a decent feature set in the cost provided. There are other products in the line that are better performing and have better feature sets, but the price that stream charges and the feature set and usability it provides are decent and worth the price.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have tried to reach out a few times and the cust service dept was inept. Slow to get to and when we did get through they were not bright folks. Thankfully we haven't had to call them often. But it is a security and long term concern that as we expand our need, will they be there for us? That is a remaining question. A
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I have not really contacted the support but have had friends who have and this is one of the other reasons why I switched to streamGo. Initially, I was skeptical regarding the support, but when a few of my ex-colleagues and friends told me that it is awesome, I took the decision to switch to streamGo.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
No comparison. MUGA was the best solution and the best technology. It was an easy decision. The biggest challenge was getting a contract and securing ourselves as a customer to get the very first video set up and to get a call back on a few insurance/cyber security questions answered before we had our first official call.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The reason for switching was major because of the cost-cutting. If I were to compare them to the products mentioned above, I'd say all three of them have their own pros and cons but are mostly superior and better than a stream. If it hadn't been for the cost-cutting I wouldn't have jumped to stream.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info