Mule ESB vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Mule ESB
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Mule ESB, from Mulesoft, is an open source middleware solution.N/A
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
ActiveMatrix Service Grid is an SOA governance and application server, from TIBCO.N/A
Pricing
Mule ESBTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Mule ESBTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Mule ESBTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Mule ESBTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
SOA Governance
Comparison of SOA Governance features of Product A and Product B
Mule ESB
-
Ratings
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
5.8
1 Ratings
14% below category average
Service registry00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Service management00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Service discovery00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Dependency management00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Policy management00 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Mule ESBTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
Oracle SOA Suite
Oracle SOA Suite
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Mule ESBTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Likelihood to Recommend
9.8
(5 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Mule ESBTIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Likelihood to Recommend
Salesforce
If you’re bringing anything into Salesforce you should just invest now into Mule, you will get your money’s worth and find a myriad of uses to build APIs between many other systems. Once you build a component you can easily reuse it as a building block to attach to another source/destination. This makes it easy to ramp up quickly and spread usage of Mule throughout your enterprise. A good value for medium to large companies, but probably cheaper to outsource your job to a consulting firm if you are smaller.
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
It fits perfectly for SOA and EAI architecture with large numbers of services that required to be wired to each other, the binding virtualization is quite good to simply this part. For the simple scenario of orchestration and /or ESB architecture could be a better use traditional stack.
Read full review
Pros
Salesforce
  • It is best suited for Rest API development. Mule ESB uses RAML as an API descriptor which is less complex and easy to understand. RAML is an open standard majorly supported by Mulesoft. Once RAML is developed, it is very easy (a few clicks)to create flows corresponding to the resources defined in the RAML. One can also include JSON schema validation in RAML, and with the use of APIkit router, Mule ESB makes the request validation very easy (it's automatic basically.)
  • Mule ESB comes with a large spectrum of community and enterprise connectors. We have connectors for all the major platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Salesforce, SAP, etc. This enables Mule ESB to integrate with the other systems in a faster and more robust way. Mule ESB has many components to fulfill the requirements of each integration (for example batch processing, parallel processing, choice, etc.)
  • Mule API gateway is one of the best tools (modules) of Mulesoft's offering. It supports API governance and management very well. One can easily enforce policies on their APIs with API gateway. It enables some of the must-have features in an API solution (i.e. throttling, oAuth, access levels, etc.)
  • Implementing a CI/CD (DevOps) environment for Mule ESB is a very easy task. Mule majorly uses MAVEN as its build tool, which in turn makes it best suitable for CI/CD approach. Mule also provides MAVEN plugins for auto deployments to the servers. Mule also has a best Unit testing module which is MUnit. MUnit can be used for both Unit and Functional testing, and it is easy to write and generates coverage reports in various formats.
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
  • reduce the number of http port required by services
  • simplified the binding connection amongst services
  • high scalability and fast deployment of applications
Read full review
Cons
Salesforce
  • Make sure to not over-engineer shared components. It can complicate development
  • Create a roadmap for where you are going - if not, you may miss components
  • I suggest getting support, otherwise it could be a difficult learning curve
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
  • health check of services and application features has been released with a lot of bugs that have never been fixed
  • it is not so simple to apply the security policy to service/reference binding
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Salesforce
It doesn't have API . We have to go for another API manager. But in Mule, it has both API manager and ESB
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
TIBCO service grid has been chosen as a natural selection of the TIBCO product evolution. The high flexibility and the binding virtualization fits very well with client needs for its EAI applications due to the huge number of services and applications, the management of application dependencies during deployment, the advantage of perfect integration with EMS for logging
Read full review
Return on Investment
Salesforce
  • Overall a great tool for complex integrations
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
  • The integration of old BW with BWSE and its interface quite similar to design time has reduced the cost of training for developers
  • The TIBCO support for this product is no the best and clients complains too much about this. This required to find a workaround or force the client to move to new/or different product. Huge impact on ROI
Read full review
ScreenShots